Gender knowledge and gender relations on higher education sport and physical education courses

This chapter is a reflection of our combined experience of over twenty years teaching gender relations as part of modules on social issues and the sociology of sport and our concerns about the marginalisation of gender knowledge on higher education (HE) sport and physical education (PE) courses. This marginalisation, alongside the way that gender knowledge is taught, challenged, and resisted by colleagues and students may partially explain the ongoing gender essentialist policies and practices in PE and school sport. We apply concepts from Elias’ figurational sociology focusing on power, interdependence, and the social construction of knowledge to consider the ways in which curricula content reflects dominant ideas about gender essentialism. Drawing on data from colleagues across the sector teaching sport and PE courses, alongside students studying on these degrees, we firstly explore higher education sport and PE curricula and gender knowledge, and secondly, we consider experiences of teaching and being taught gender knowledge to highlight the interdependency between curricula content, pedagogy, and power.

Publication Details

Journal
ChiPrints (University of Chichester)
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032502298
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender knowledge and gender relations on higher education sport and physical education courses

ChiPrints (University of Chichester)
Physical Education and Pedagogy
article

Gender knowledge and gender relations on higher education sport and physical education courses

article en

Abstract

This chapter is a reflection of our combined experience of over twenty years teaching gender relations as part of modules on social issues and the sociology of sport and our concerns about the marginalisation of gender knowledge on higher education (HE) sport and physical education (PE) courses. This marginalisation, alongside the way that gender knowledge is taught, challenged, and resisted by colleagues and students may partially explain the ongoing gender essentialist policies and practices in PE and school sport. We apply concepts from Elias’ figurational sociology focusing on power, interdependence, and the social construction of knowledge to consider the ways in which curricula content reflects dominant ideas about gender essentialism. Drawing on data from colleagues across the sector teaching sport and PE courses, alongside students studying on these degrees, we firstly explore higher education sport and PE curricula and gender knowledge, and secondly, we consider experiences of teaching and being taught gender knowledge to highlight the interdependency between curricula content, pedagogy, and power.

ChiPrints (University of Chichester)
Gender equality, Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender knowledge and gender relations on higher education sport and physical education courses · ChiPrints (University of Chichester) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS