Clinical study of levetiracetam or oxcarbazepine monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine in the treatment of focal epilepsy. Methods A total of 476 patients with focal epilepsy treated at Fujian Provincial Hospital from October 2020 to October 2022 were selected. Based on their medication, they were divided into the levetiracetam group (n = 275) and the oxcarbazepine group (n = 201). Both groups underwent continuous treatment for 12 months. The overall effective rate and incidence of adverse reactions in both groups and different subgroups were analyzed. Results The overall effective rate in the levetiracetam group was 57.82% (159/275), and in the oxcarbazepine group was 46.77% (94/201). The overall effective rate in the levetiracetam group was higher than that in the oxcarbazepine group (χ2 = 5.696, P = 0.017). Efficacy analysis of levetiracetam monotherapy across different age subgroups showed statistically significant differences (χ2 = 6.785, P = 0.034), with the overall effective rate in younger patients being higher than that in minors (χ2 = 3.898, P = 0.048) and middle-aged/older patients (χ2 = 4.946, P = 0.026). Levetiracetam was more effective in patients with initially normal imaging compared to those with abnormal imaging (χ2 = 5.349, P = 0.021). In the oxcarbazepine monotherapy subgroup analysis, oxcarbazepine was also more effective in patients with initially normal imaging (χ2 = 10.036, P = 0.002). Efficacy analysis of the same subgroup with different medications indicated that for younger patients with focal epilepsy, levetiracetam was superior to oxcarbazepine (χ2 = 6.591, P = 0.010). In the levetiracetam group, 13 cases (4.73%) experienced adverse reactions, while the oxcarbazepine group had 19 cases (9.45%). The incidence of adverse reactions in the oxcarbazepine group was higher than that in the levetiracetam group (χ2 = 4.135, P = 0.042). Conclusions Compared to oxcarbazepine monotherapy, levetiracetam monotherapy demonstrated better clinical efficacy in treating focal epilepsy, particularly in younger patients. The incidence of adverse reactions in levetiracetam was lower. Both medications were more effective in patients with initially normal imaging compared to those with abnormal imaging.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2024.10.011
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical study of levetiracetam or oxcarbazepine monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Clinical study of levetiracetam or oxcarbazepine monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy

article en

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine in the treatment of focal epilepsy. Methods A total of 476 patients with focal epilepsy treated at Fujian Provincial Hospital from October 2020 to October 2022 were selected. Based on their medication, they were divided into the levetiracetam group (n = 275) and the oxcarbazepine group (n = 201). Both groups underwent continuous treatment for 12 months. The overall effective rate and incidence of adverse reactions in both groups and different subgroups were analyzed. Results The overall effective rate in the levetiracetam group was 57.82% (159/275), and in the oxcarbazepine group was 46.77% (94/201). The overall effective rate in the levetiracetam group was higher than that in the oxcarbazepine group (χ2 = 5.696, P = 0.017). Efficacy analysis of levetiracetam monotherapy across different age subgroups showed statistically significant differences (χ2 = 6.785, P = 0.034), with the overall effective rate in younger patients being higher than that in minors (χ2 = 3.898, P = 0.048) and middle-aged/older patients (χ2 = 4.946, P = 0.026). Levetiracetam was more effective in patients with initially normal imaging compared to those with abnormal imaging (χ2 = 5.349, P = 0.021). In the oxcarbazepine monotherapy subgroup analysis, oxcarbazepine was also more effective in patients with initially normal imaging (χ2 = 10.036, P = 0.002). Efficacy analysis of the same subgroup with different medications indicated that for younger patients with focal epilepsy, levetiracetam was superior to oxcarbazepine (χ2 = 6.591, P = 0.010). In the levetiracetam group, 13 cases (4.73%) experienced adverse reactions, while the oxcarbazepine group had 19 cases (9.45%). The incidence of adverse reactions in the oxcarbazepine group was higher than that in the levetiracetam group (χ2 = 4.135, P = 0.042). Conclusions Compared to oxcarbazepine monotherapy, levetiracetam monotherapy demonstrated better clinical efficacy in treating focal epilepsy, particularly in younger patients. The incidence of adverse reactions in levetiracetam was lower. Both medications were more effective in patients with initially normal imaging compared to those with abnormal imaging.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Fujian Medical University (CN), Beijing Tian Tan Hospital (CN), National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (CN), Fujian Provincial Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.