Tolerable magnitudes for induced seismicity at offshore carbon capture and storage projects

Induced seismicity is a risk that must be managed during the development of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects. A key step in effective management of induced seismicity is the definition of a tolerable magnitude threshold, MTOL, which defines the level at which the nuisance or damage caused by induced seismicity is likely to no longer be tolerated by affected populations. Having established MTOL, induced seismicity mitigation strategies can be implemented with the objective to avoid induced events that exceed MTOL. In this study our objective is to estimate MTOL for CCS developments in the waters around the UK. Siting CCS operations offshore reduces, but does not eliminate, the risks posed by induced seismicity by increasing the distance from exposed populations. For a given induced earthquake location and magnitude, we use ground motion models, nuisance and fragility functions, and population densities, to estimate the numbers of households that would experience different levels of disturbance and damage. We use past cases of induced seismicity that were, or were not, accepted by the public to define risk tolerances based on the numbers of households that experience different levels of disturbance or damage. We sense-check our results through comparison with observed macroseismic impacts from past, natural earthquakes located in the seas around the UK. As expected, we find that the strongest control on MTOL is the distance to the shore from the proposed project. Our results can be used by CCS operators and regulators in designing induced seismicity mitigation strategies for their sites.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000723968
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tolerable magnitudes for induced seismicity at offshore carbon capture and storage projects

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Tolerable magnitudes for induced seismicity at offshore carbon capture and storage projects

article en

Abstract

Induced seismicity is a risk that must be managed during the development of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects. A key step in effective management of induced seismicity is the definition of a tolerable magnitude threshold, MTOL, which defines the level at which the nuisance or damage caused by induced seismicity is likely to no longer be tolerated by affected populations. Having established MTOL, induced seismicity mitigation strategies can be implemented with the objective to avoid induced events that exceed MTOL. In this study our objective is to estimate MTOL for CCS developments in the waters around the UK. Siting CCS operations offshore reduces, but does not eliminate, the risks posed by induced seismicity by increasing the distance from exposed populations. For a given induced earthquake location and magnitude, we use ground motion models, nuisance and fragility functions, and population densities, to estimate the numbers of households that would experience different levels of disturbance and damage. We use past cases of induced seismicity that were, or were not, accepted by the public to define risk tolerances based on the numbers of households that experience different levels of disturbance or damage. We sense-check our results through comparison with observed macroseismic impacts from past, natural earthquakes located in the seas around the UK. As expected, we find that the strongest control on MTOL is the distance to the shore from the proposed project. Our results can be used by CCS operators and regulators in designing induced seismicity mitigation strategies for their sites.

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.