Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? Evaluating Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) Blockers for Reducing Plant DNA Contamination in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of microbial communities frequently results in off-target amplification of the host or environmental DNA, which can lead to substantial data loss. This challenge is particularly pronounced in plant-associated microbiome studies, where commonly used 16S rRNA primers co-amplify mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA. To mitigate this, Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) blockers have been applied to reduce amplification of non-bacterial DNA. However, the actual concentrations used vary highly across different studies and it is not clear whether this affects the retrieved bacterial diversity. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of universal mitochondrial and chloroplast PNA blockers across a range of concentrations and estimated their impact on alpha and beta diversity. We find that already at low concentrations (0.25 µM) PNA blockers efficiently reduce host DNA contamination. Further, they did not have a significant effect on alpha or beta diversity and no bacterial clades appear to be co-inhibited by the addition of PNA blockers. While implementing PNA blockers in PCR protocols requires further optimization, our findings demonstrate that the "juice" (enhanced sequencing depth) is indeed "worth the squeeze" (the additional effort), as PNA blockers are a powerful tool for improving microbial sequencing outcomes.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000719042
Primary Topic
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? Evaluating Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) Blockers for Reducing Plant DNA Contamination in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
article

Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? Evaluating Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) Blockers for Reducing Plant DNA Contamination in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

article en

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of microbial communities frequently results in off-target amplification of the host or environmental DNA, which can lead to substantial data loss. This challenge is particularly pronounced in plant-associated microbiome studies, where commonly used 16S rRNA primers co-amplify mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA. To mitigate this, Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) blockers have been applied to reduce amplification of non-bacterial DNA. However, the actual concentrations used vary highly across different studies and it is not clear whether this affects the retrieved bacterial diversity. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of universal mitochondrial and chloroplast PNA blockers across a range of concentrations and estimated their impact on alpha and beta diversity. We find that already at low concentrations (0.25 µM) PNA blockers efficiently reduce host DNA contamination. Further, they did not have a significant effect on alpha or beta diversity and no bacterial clades appear to be co-inhibited by the addition of PNA blockers. While implementing PNA blockers in PCR protocols requires further optimization, our findings demonstrate that the "juice" (enhanced sequencing depth) is indeed "worth the squeeze" (the additional effort), as PNA blockers are a powerful tool for improving microbial sequencing outcomes.

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Universität Zürich
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.