Comparative analysis of late gadolinium enhancement assessment techniques for monitoring fibrotic changes in myocarditis follow-up

Objectives: To compare the repeatability and interrelation of various late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessment techniques for monitoring fibrotic changes in myocarditis follow-up. Materials and methods: LGE extent change between baseline and 3-month cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was compared in patients with acute myocarditis using the full width at half maximum (FWHM), gray-scale thresholds at 5 and 6 standard deviations (SD5 and SD6), visual assessment with threshold (VAT) and full manual (FM) techniques. In addition, visual presence score (VPS), visual transmurality score (VTS), and a simplified visual change score (VCS) were assessed. Intraclass-correlation (ICC) was used to evaluate repeatability, and methods were compared using Spearman’s correlation. Results: Forty-seven patients (38 male, median age: 27 [IQR: 21; 38] years) were included. LGE extent change differed among quantitative techniques (p < 0.01), with variability in the proportion of patients showing LGE change during follow-up (FWHM: 62%, SD5: 74%, SD6: 66%, VAT: 43%, FM: 60%, VPS: 53%, VTS: 77%, VCS: 89%). Repeatability was highest with FWHM (ICC: 0.97) and lowest with SD5 (ICC: 0.89). Semiquantitative scoring had slightly lower values (VPS ICC: 0.81; VTS ICC: 0.71). VCS repeatability was excellent (ICC: 0.93). VPS and VTS correlated with quantitative techniques, while VCS was positively associated with VPS, VTS, VAT, and FM, but not with FWHM, SD5, and SD6. Conclusion: FWHM offers the least observer-dependent LGE follow-up after myocarditis. VPS, VTS, and VCS are practical alternatives, showing reliable correlations with quantitative methods. Classification of patients exhibiting either stable or changing LGE relies on the assessment technique. Clinical relevance statement: This study shows that LGE monitoring in myocarditis is technique-dependent; the FWHM method yields the most consistent fibrotic tracking results, with scoring-based techniques as reliable alternatives.