Gustaw Herling-Grudziński i Konstanty A. Jeleński o malarstwie Jana Lebensteina

The article compares the views of Gustaw Herling-Grudziński and Konstanty A. Jeleński on Jan Lebenstein’s painting. Drawing on observations and reflections voiced by Grudzinski in his diaristic works (1971–1999) and an essay (1994), as well as Jeleński’s critical writings – primarily reviews and essays written between 1960 and 1985 in Polish and French – the article highlights their shared perspectives on Lebenstein’s art. Their opinions on the art and artistic demeanor of the creator of Axial Figures were constant and notably similar. The article also identifies key differences in their approaches: specifically, Jeleński’s complex critical discourse is contrasted with with diaristic format of Herling-Grudziński’s concise observations. Additionally, the article examines their differing opinions on avant-garde and experimental trends in 20th-century art, against which they position Lebenstein’s oevre.

Publication Details

Journal
Elementary Education in Theory and Practice (Jesuit University of Philosophy and Education Ignatianum)
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35765/pk.2025.4902.09
Primary Topic
Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gustaw Herling-Grudziński i Konstanty A. Jeleński o malarstwie Jana Lebensteina

Elementary Education in Theory and Practice (Jesuit University of Philosophy and Education Ignatianum)
Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
article

Gustaw Herling-Grudziński i Konstanty A. Jeleński o malarstwie Jana Lebensteina

article en

Abstract

The article compares the views of Gustaw Herling-Grudziński and Konstanty A. Jeleński on Jan Lebenstein’s painting. Drawing on observations and reflections voiced by Grudzinski in his diaristic works (1971–1999) and an essay (1994), as well as Jeleński’s critical writings – primarily reviews and essays written between 1960 and 1985 in Polish and French – the article highlights their shared perspectives on Lebenstein’s art. Their opinions on the art and artistic demeanor of the creator of Axial Figures were constant and notably similar. The article also identifies key differences in their approaches: specifically, Jeleński’s complex critical discourse is contrasted with with diaristic format of Herling-Grudziński’s concise observations. Additionally, the article examines their differing opinions on avant-garde and experimental trends in 20th-century art, against which they position Lebenstein’s oevre.

Elementary Education in Theory and Practice (Jesuit University of Philosophy and Education Ignatianum)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.