Trust in the Context of Intercultural Negotiations: A Systematic Review

The aim of this article is to systematically review research on trust in the context of intercultural negotiations. After reviewing over 600 articles based on abstracts and titles, a comprehensive analysis of 48 selected papers was conducted to propose a conceptual model based on findings and theoretical integration. Trust is a crucial element in negotiations, and it is even more important in intercultural contexts. Individuals from different cultures (low-trust vs. high-trust) not only assess trustworthiness differently and exhibit varying levels of trust but also tend to trust members of other cultures to a lower degree. We combine theories and empirical findings to explain the underlying mechanisms of trust in intercultural negotiations. By integrating Social Identity Theory, Similarity-Attraction Theory, and Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice, we offer a holistic approach. We emphasize adaptability as an essential skill for establishing trustful relationships, encompassing the reduction of perceived threats, the increase of perceived similarity, and the bridging of cultural divides to counteract in-group favoritism. Adaptation influences both the negotiation situation and the process of trust-building, enabling the recategorization of individuals into an extended in-group. This review provides insights for practitioners and scholars by synthesizing the current state of knowledge, highlighting the importance of adaptability in trust-building, and suggesting future research directions in this dynamic field.

Publication Details

Journal
SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University)
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34891/a0mc-jx98
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust in the Context of Intercultural Negotiations: A Systematic Review

SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University)
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Trust in the Context of Intercultural Negotiations: A Systematic Review

article en

Abstract

The aim of this article is to systematically review research on trust in the context of intercultural negotiations. After reviewing over 600 articles based on abstracts and titles, a comprehensive analysis of 48 selected papers was conducted to propose a conceptual model based on findings and theoretical integration. Trust is a crucial element in negotiations, and it is even more important in intercultural contexts. Individuals from different cultures (low-trust vs. high-trust) not only assess trustworthiness differently and exhibit varying levels of trust but also tend to trust members of other cultures to a lower degree. We combine theories and empirical findings to explain the underlying mechanisms of trust in intercultural negotiations. By integrating Social Identity Theory, Similarity-Attraction Theory, and Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice, we offer a holistic approach. We emphasize adaptability as an essential skill for establishing trustful relationships, encompassing the reduction of perceived threats, the increase of perceived similarity, and the bridging of cultural divides to counteract in-group favoritism. Adaptation influences both the negotiation situation and the process of trust-building, enabling the recategorization of individuals into an extended in-group. This review provides insights for practitioners and scholars by synthesizing the current state of knowledge, highlighting the importance of adaptability in trust-building, and suggesting future research directions in this dynamic field.

SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.