1,4‐Dichlorobenzene

The German Commission for the investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area has re‐evaluated 1,4‐dichlorobenzene [106‐46‐7] considering all toxicological endpoints. Available publications and unpublished study reports are described in detail. In mouse liver, 1,4‐dichlorobenzene causes carcinoma after oral and inhalation exposure and is mitogenic and cytotoxic. In reliable studies it is not genotoxic. As a non‐genotoxic mechanism is of prime importance and genotoxic effects play at most a minor part, provided the maximum concentration at the workplace (MAK value) is observed, 1,4‐dichlororbenzene is now classified in Category 4 for carcinogenic substances. The chronic local NOAEC of 20 ml/m3 for changes in the olfactory epithelium of the rat nose would correspond to a MAK value of 10 ml/m3. However, the most sensitive toxicological effect is hepatocellular hypertrophy with a LOAEL of 10 mg/kg body weight and day in an oral 52‐week study with dogs. Because of the low severity and incidence of the effect, a NAEL (no adverse effect level) of 5 mg/kg body weight and day is assumed. This NAEL is scaled to a MAK value of 2 ml/m3. Since a systemic effect is critical, Peak Limitation Category II is assigned. As it is not known if the effects are due to the metabolites or 1,4‐dichlorobenzene itself, the default excursion factor of 2 is assigned. The NOAECs for developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits are 500 and 100 ml/m3, respectively, and the differences to the MAK value are sufficient. Therefore, damage to the embryo or foetus is unlikely when the MAK value is observed and 1,4‐dichlorobenzene is assigned to Pregnancy Risk Group C. Skin contact may contribute significantly to systemic toxicity and 1,4‐dichlorobenzene remains designated with an “H” notation. Sensitization is not expected from the limited data.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PUBLISSO
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34865/mb10646e6519_w
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1,4‐Dichlorobenzene

PUBLISSO
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

1,4‐Dichlorobenzene

article en

Abstract

The German Commission for the investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area has re‐evaluated 1,4‐dichlorobenzene [106‐46‐7] considering all toxicological endpoints. Available publications and unpublished study reports are described in detail. In mouse liver, 1,4‐dichlorobenzene causes carcinoma after oral and inhalation exposure and is mitogenic and cytotoxic. In reliable studies it is not genotoxic. As a non‐genotoxic mechanism is of prime importance and genotoxic effects play at most a minor part, provided the maximum concentration at the workplace (MAK value) is observed, 1,4‐dichlororbenzene is now classified in Category 4 for carcinogenic substances. The chronic local NOAEC of 20 ml/m3 for changes in the olfactory epithelium of the rat nose would correspond to a MAK value of 10 ml/m3. However, the most sensitive toxicological effect is hepatocellular hypertrophy with a LOAEL of 10 mg/kg body weight and day in an oral 52‐week study with dogs. Because of the low severity and incidence of the effect, a NAEL (no adverse effect level) of 5 mg/kg body weight and day is assumed. This NAEL is scaled to a MAK value of 2 ml/m3. Since a systemic effect is critical, Peak Limitation Category II is assigned. As it is not known if the effects are due to the metabolites or 1,4‐dichlorobenzene itself, the default excursion factor of 2 is assigned. The NOAECs for developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits are 500 and 100 ml/m3, respectively, and the differences to the MAK value are sufficient. Therefore, damage to the embryo or foetus is unlikely when the MAK value is observed and 1,4‐dichlorobenzene is assigned to Pregnancy Risk Group C. Skin contact may contribute significantly to systemic toxicity and 1,4‐dichlorobenzene remains designated with an “H” notation. Sensitization is not expected from the limited data.

PUBLISSO
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.