Mentorship in surgical training; a systematic scoping review to inform a mentorship framework for ophthalmology trainees

Background Mentorship plays a vital role in surgical training. In the field of ophthalmology, effective mentorship is particularly critical due to the specialised nature of surgeries and the need for comprehensive skill development. However, the landscape of mentorship remains underexplored. Understanding key characteristics and components of effective mentorship is essential for optimising training and ensuring the success of future generations of surgeons. This scoping review aims to analyse existing literature on mentorship in surgical training and to employ Levac et al.‘s enhanced methodological framework to construct a conceptual framework for a bespoke mentorship programme tailored to the needs of ophthalmology trainees. Methods The search strategy adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and included relevant databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, ERIC, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Selection criteria encompassed studies exploring mentorship experiences, perceptions, and outcomes across all surgical training domains. A two-step screening process was employed, followed by thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke’s approach. The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) assessed study quality. Results Of the 81 identified articles, 24 were included in the review, with an average MERSQI score of 11.65. Studies comprised randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, cohort, cross-sectional studies, and reviews. The thematic analysis identified five domains: (1) mentorship and burnout; (2) surgical skill and performance; (3) career paths and professional development; (4) diversity promotion; and (5) work-life balance. Conclusions This review underscores the significance of mentorship in surgical training and proposes a conceptual framework tailored to ophthalmology trainees. By synthesising existing literature and through author engagement with relevant training bodies, the study contributes to the development of an imminent mentoring programme, aiming to enhance surgical training outcomes and foster trainee well-being and professional growth