Ethylamin

The German Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area has re‐evaluated ethylamine [75‐04‐7], considering all toxicological endpoints. The critical effect is irritation of the nasal epithelium of rats with a NOAEC of 100 ml/m3 in a 24‐week inhalation study. The maximum concentration at the workplace (MAK value) for ethylamine is derived by using additional data of the structurally related diethylamine. For diethylamine a MAK value of 2 ml/m3 was derived based on a two‐year study in rats with a NOAEC of 16 ml/m3 for irritation of the nasal epithelium and a study in humans with a LOAEC of 10 ml/m3 for sensory irritation. As the inhalation toxicity of ethylamine is lower than that of diethylamine, the previous MAK value for ethylamine of 5 ml/m3 is retained. As the local effect is critical, ethylamine remains classified in Peak Limitation Category I. The excursion factor of 2 and the momentary value (concentration which must not be exceeded at any time) of 10 ml/m3 are retained. There are no developmental toxicity studies and ethylamine remains assigned to Pregnancy Risk Group D. Ethylamine is not genotoxic in vitro, data on genotoxicity in vivo and carcinogenicity are lacking. There is, however, no corresponding structural alert. There are no data on sensitization. According to skin absorption models, percutaneous absorption does not contribute significantly to systemic toxicity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PUBLISSO
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34865/mb7504d0066_w
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethylamin

PUBLISSO
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

Ethylamin

article en

Abstract

The German Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area has re‐evaluated ethylamine [75‐04‐7], considering all toxicological endpoints. The critical effect is irritation of the nasal epithelium of rats with a NOAEC of 100 ml/m3 in a 24‐week inhalation study. The maximum concentration at the workplace (MAK value) for ethylamine is derived by using additional data of the structurally related diethylamine. For diethylamine a MAK value of 2 ml/m3 was derived based on a two‐year study in rats with a NOAEC of 16 ml/m3 for irritation of the nasal epithelium and a study in humans with a LOAEC of 10 ml/m3 for sensory irritation. As the inhalation toxicity of ethylamine is lower than that of diethylamine, the previous MAK value for ethylamine of 5 ml/m3 is retained. As the local effect is critical, ethylamine remains classified in Peak Limitation Category I. The excursion factor of 2 and the momentary value (concentration which must not be exceeded at any time) of 10 ml/m3 are retained. There are no developmental toxicity studies and ethylamine remains assigned to Pregnancy Risk Group D. Ethylamine is not genotoxic in vitro, data on genotoxicity in vivo and carcinogenicity are lacking. There is, however, no corresponding structural alert. There are no data on sensitization. According to skin absorption models, percutaneous absorption does not contribute significantly to systemic toxicity.

PUBLISSO
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Akademie für Gesundheitsberufe (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.