Consensus between healthcare professionals on the “appropriateness” of attendances in an Irish emergency department

Background Non-urgent care attendances to the emergency department (ED) increase the strain on this sector. Identification of patients who may benefit from appropriate alternative care pathways may serve to lessen ED crowding. However, healthcare professionals from different specialties may differ in their opinion of what is an appropriate use of ED services. Aim The study aims to establish the consensus between healthcare professionals, from different specialties, on the appropriateness of attendances to an Irish ED. Methods This was a single centre, cross-sectional study. Data were compiled in anonymised patient summary files (n = 77) from adults attending the ED over 24 h period. These summary files were reviewed by five different healthcare professionals; an emergency medicine consultant (EMC), an emergency medicine specialist registrar (EM SpR), an ED clinical nurse manager (CMN), an advanced paramedic (AP) and a general practitioner (GP). The clinicians were asked if the patient could have been managed by GP the same day or next day, if the patient’s ED visit was an inappropriate use of ED resources and to rank on a scale of 0–10 how appropriate the ED visit was. Results Inter-rater agreement on management by GP in 24–48 h was 56% and ranged from 30% (CMN) to 40% (EMC). For inappropriate use of ED resources, consensus was 58% and ranged from 12% (GP) to 35% (EMC). Median “appropriateness” rating ranged from 6 (EM SpR) to 8 (AP and CMN). When the “appropriateness” scale was trichotomized, the “inappropriate” attendances ranged from 1% (CMN) to 21% (EM SpR), whilst “appropriate” attendances ranged from 47% (EM SpR) to CMN (78%). Conclusion Despite agreement that there was “inappropriate” use of ED services, healthcare professionals from diferent backgrounds did not reach a general consensus on which attendances were inappropriate. Therefore, expectations regarding patients’ ability to self-assess illness or injury severity related to ED attendances may not be reasonable.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34961/researchrepository-ul.29037989.v1
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consensus between healthcare professionals on the “appropriateness” of attendances in an Irish emergency department

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Consensus between healthcare professionals on the “appropriateness” of attendances in an Irish emergency department

article en

Abstract

Background Non-urgent care attendances to the emergency department (ED) increase the strain on this sector. Identification of patients who may benefit from appropriate alternative care pathways may serve to lessen ED crowding. However, healthcare professionals from different specialties may differ in their opinion of what is an appropriate use of ED services. Aim The study aims to establish the consensus between healthcare professionals, from different specialties, on the appropriateness of attendances to an Irish ED. Methods This was a single centre, cross-sectional study. Data were compiled in anonymised patient summary files (n = 77) from adults attending the ED over 24 h period. These summary files were reviewed by five different healthcare professionals; an emergency medicine consultant (EMC), an emergency medicine specialist registrar (EM SpR), an ED clinical nurse manager (CMN), an advanced paramedic (AP) and a general practitioner (GP). The clinicians were asked if the patient could have been managed by GP the same day or next day, if the patient’s ED visit was an inappropriate use of ED resources and to rank on a scale of 0–10 how appropriate the ED visit was. Results Inter-rater agreement on management by GP in 24–48 h was 56% and ranged from 30% (CMN) to 40% (EMC). For inappropriate use of ED resources, consensus was 58% and ranged from 12% (GP) to 35% (EMC). Median “appropriateness” rating ranged from 6 (EM SpR) to 8 (AP and CMN). When the “appropriateness” scale was trichotomized, the “inappropriate” attendances ranged from 1% (CMN) to 21% (EM SpR), whilst “appropriate” attendances ranged from 47% (EM SpR) to CMN (78%). Conclusion Despite agreement that there was “inappropriate” use of ED services, healthcare professionals from diferent backgrounds did not reach a general consensus on which attendances were inappropriate. Therefore, expectations regarding patients’ ability to self-assess illness or injury severity related to ED attendances may not be reasonable.

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
University of Limerick (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consensus between healthcare professionals on the “appropriateness” of attendances in an Irish emergency department · University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS