Cross-cultural validation of the integrated palliative outcome scale for neurological patients (IPOS-Neuro S8) in multiple sclerosis patients

AbstractObjectives: Standardized measures to evaluate neurological patients in palliative care are missing. The Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale, a self-report tailored for neurological patients (IPOS Neuro-S8) helps identify symptom burden but lacks validation in German. This study aimed to validate the IPOS Neuro-S8 in severely affected multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.Methods: This validation study is a secondary analysis of data from a clinical phase II intervention study with severely affected MS patients. The original study enrolled German-speaking patients aged 18 with severe MS who receive an escalating immunotherapeutic agent and/or exhibit a high level of disability were recruited from the administrative district Cologne (#DRKS00021783). In this validation study, we evaluated construct, discriminant, and convergent validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change of the IPOS Neuro-S8, using the "Hamburger Lebensqualitätsmessinstrument" (HALEMS), and the Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation supplemented by neurological symptoms (HOPE+) as comparison measures.Results: Data from 80 MS patients (mean age 56, SD = 11) were analyzed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a 3-factor structure (r = 0.34-0.63), reflecting distinct clinical patterns, i.e., breath-mouth connection, pain-sleep cycle, and nausea-vomiting link. Significant convergent validity to hypothesized total score of the HOPE+ (rs(78) = 0.71, p < 0.001) and good discriminant validity using the HALEMS total score (rs(78) = 0.48, p < 0.001) were observed. Correlation with physical symptoms of the HALEMS was stronger than with nonphysical aspects. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.67) and test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient = 0.75) were acceptable.Significance of results: IPOS Neuro-S8 displays promising psychometric properties for assessing palliative care symptoms in severe MS, a model for other severe neurological diseases due to MS's broad central nervous involvement, allowing findings to be transferable to other neurological diseases. A criterion for minimal clinically important difference was established to evaluate the sensitivity to change. Additional validation across different neurological conditions and disease severities is warranted to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.Keywords: German; Palliative care concerns; outcome measurement; prospective observational design; symptom burden.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JuSER Publikationsportal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34734/fzj-2025-03245
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-cultural validation of the integrated palliative outcome scale for neurological patients (IPOS-Neuro S8) in multiple sclerosis patients

JuSER Publikationsportal
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Cross-cultural validation of the integrated palliative outcome scale for neurological patients (IPOS-Neuro S8) in multiple sclerosis patients

article en

Abstract

AbstractObjectives: Standardized measures to evaluate neurological patients in palliative care are missing. The Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale, a self-report tailored for neurological patients (IPOS Neuro-S8) helps identify symptom burden but lacks validation in German. This study aimed to validate the IPOS Neuro-S8 in severely affected multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.Methods: This validation study is a secondary analysis of data from a clinical phase II intervention study with severely affected MS patients. The original study enrolled German-speaking patients aged 18 with severe MS who receive an escalating immunotherapeutic agent and/or exhibit a high level of disability were recruited from the administrative district Cologne (#DRKS00021783). In this validation study, we evaluated construct, discriminant, and convergent validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change of the IPOS Neuro-S8, using the "Hamburger Lebensqualitätsmessinstrument" (HALEMS), and the Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation supplemented by neurological symptoms (HOPE+) as comparison measures.Results: Data from 80 MS patients (mean age 56, SD = 11) were analyzed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a 3-factor structure (r = 0.34-0.63), reflecting distinct clinical patterns, i.e., breath-mouth connection, pain-sleep cycle, and nausea-vomiting link. Significant convergent validity to hypothesized total score of the HOPE+ (rs(78) = 0.71, p < 0.001) and good discriminant validity using the HALEMS total score (rs(78) = 0.48, p < 0.001) were observed. Correlation with physical symptoms of the HALEMS was stronger than with nonphysical aspects. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.67) and test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient = 0.75) were acceptable.Significance of results: IPOS Neuro-S8 displays promising psychometric properties for assessing palliative care symptoms in severe MS, a model for other severe neurological diseases due to MS's broad central nervous involvement, allowing findings to be transferable to other neurological diseases. A criterion for minimal clinically important difference was established to evaluate the sensitivity to change. Additional validation across different neurological conditions and disease severities is warranted to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.Keywords: German; Palliative care concerns; outcome measurement; prospective observational design; symptom burden.

JuSER Publikationsportal
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.