Comparative Analysis of Fashion Captioning and Multimodal Fashion Recommendation

This thesis explores two main tasks: (1) fine-tuning image captioning models for fashion datasets and (2) evaluating different feature spaces for personalized fashion recommendations. We fine-tune state-of-the-art vision-language models - BLIP-2 and LLaVA - on two fashion datasets, H&M and FACAD, to generate product descriptions. Our quantitative and qualitative analyses show that fine-tuning can achieve performance levels comparable to fully training a model (SRFC) specifically for generating "fashion captions".With our qualitative analysis of the captioning results, we take a deep dive into understanding the models' limitations and identify what works well and what does not. We find that working with datasets that have clearly identifiable visual cues for words, e.g., front pocket, can improve the fine-tuning process. The models struggled with non-visual attributes (e.g., material composition, designer names), distinguishing fine-grained differences (e.g., satin vs. velvet), and handling partial or ambiguous product images. These limitations highlight the need for dataset curation that emphasizes visible attributes.For recommendations, we extract multimodal features (visual, textual, and combined) and evaluate them using the VBPR recommendation algorithm on the H&M dataset. Besides sophisticated models for feature embeddings such as ResNet50 (visual features) or SentenceBERT (textual features), we use our, on the H&M dataset, fine-tuned BLIP-2 model to extract additional features, which we hypothesized to work better. Surprisingly, textual embeddings performed better than visual and multimodal features with VBPR, suggesting that text-based attributes provide better signals for recommendations than image features, in this setup. However, overall performance across different feature spaces remains similar, with ItemKNN outperforming VBPR results.Our findings demonstrate that fine-tuning is an effective and simpler alternative to complex reward-based training. Additionally, despite fashion being a visual domain, textual descriptions resulted in the best recommendation performance. Future work should focus on exploring the performance of already available models for fashion datasets and refining datasets for better performance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
reposiTUm (TU Wien)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2025.115007
Primary Topic
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Fashion Captioning and Multimodal Fashion Recommendation

reposiTUm (TU Wien)
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
article

Comparative Analysis of Fashion Captioning and Multimodal Fashion Recommendation

article en

Abstract

This thesis explores two main tasks: (1) fine-tuning image captioning models for fashion datasets and (2) evaluating different feature spaces for personalized fashion recommendations. We fine-tune state-of-the-art vision-language models - BLIP-2 and LLaVA - on two fashion datasets, H&M and FACAD, to generate product descriptions. Our quantitative and qualitative analyses show that fine-tuning can achieve performance levels comparable to fully training a model (SRFC) specifically for generating "fashion captions".With our qualitative analysis of the captioning results, we take a deep dive into understanding the models' limitations and identify what works well and what does not. We find that working with datasets that have clearly identifiable visual cues for words, e.g., front pocket, can improve the fine-tuning process. The models struggled with non-visual attributes (e.g., material composition, designer names), distinguishing fine-grained differences (e.g., satin vs. velvet), and handling partial or ambiguous product images. These limitations highlight the need for dataset curation that emphasizes visible attributes.For recommendations, we extract multimodal features (visual, textual, and combined) and evaluate them using the VBPR recommendation algorithm on the H&M dataset. Besides sophisticated models for feature embeddings such as ResNet50 (visual features) or SentenceBERT (textual features), we use our, on the H&M dataset, fine-tuned BLIP-2 model to extract additional features, which we hypothesized to work better. Surprisingly, textual embeddings performed better than visual and multimodal features with VBPR, suggesting that text-based attributes provide better signals for recommendations than image features, in this setup. However, overall performance across different feature spaces remains similar, with ItemKNN outperforming VBPR results.Our findings demonstrate that fine-tuning is an effective and simpler alternative to complex reward-based training. Additionally, despite fashion being a visual domain, textual descriptions resulted in the best recommendation performance. Future work should focus on exploring the performance of already available models for fashion datasets and refining datasets for better performance.

reposiTUm (TU Wien)
TU Wien (AT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Fashion Captioning and Multimodal Fashion Recommendation · reposiTUm (TU Wien) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS