Intercultural Interfaces: Artificial intelligence and the challenges of cultural sensitivity

This study investigates the intersection of cultural sensitivity and AI-driven machine translation tools in translation education, with a focus on Portuguese-Chinese language pairs. Drawing on mixed-methods research, it explores how students perceive and use AI tools for translation, the challenges they face, and the tools’ limitations in managing cultural nuances, idiomatic expressions, and contextually rich texts. Findings highlight that while tools like DeepL and ChatGPT offer efficiency and accessibility, they often fail to capture cultural and emotional depth, necessitating human oversight. Higher-performing students critically engage with AI outputs, while less proficient students rely heavily on these tools, often overlooking errors. The study underscores the need for translation curricula to integrate AI literacy, critical thinking, and cultural analysis to prepare students for hybrid human-AI workflows. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of AI’s role in culturally sensitive translation and its pedagogical implications.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Instituto Politécnico do Porto
Published
2025-06-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34630/e-rei.vi13.6325
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intercultural Interfaces: Artificial intelligence and the challenges of cultural sensitivity

Instituto Politécnico do Porto
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Intercultural Interfaces: Artificial intelligence and the challenges of cultural sensitivity

article en

Abstract

This study investigates the intersection of cultural sensitivity and AI-driven machine translation tools in translation education, with a focus on Portuguese-Chinese language pairs. Drawing on mixed-methods research, it explores how students perceive and use AI tools for translation, the challenges they face, and the tools’ limitations in managing cultural nuances, idiomatic expressions, and contextually rich texts. Findings highlight that while tools like DeepL and ChatGPT offer efficiency and accessibility, they often fail to capture cultural and emotional depth, necessitating human oversight. Higher-performing students critically engage with AI outputs, while less proficient students rely heavily on these tools, often overlooking errors. The study underscores the need for translation curricula to integrate AI literacy, critical thinking, and cultural analysis to prepare students for hybrid human-AI workflows. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of AI’s role in culturally sensitive translation and its pedagogical implications.

Instituto Politécnico do Porto
Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.