Genotyping and Beta–Lactamase Production of Escherichia coli Isolated from Different Sources

It was collected 145 samples from a variety of clinical sources, including urinary tract infections, wounds, blood, respiratory tract infections, stool, sputum, and high vaginal swabs, from various hospitals in Baghdad. Following the collection, we conducted microscopic examinations, biochemical examinations, and diagnosis. The Vitek-2 Compact System conducted the final analysis. It was gotten 50 isolates of Escherichia coli, and 34% of those were from urinary tract infections, wounds, respiratory system infections, sputum, and vaginal swabs. 72% of the isolates were from urinary tract infections, 14% were from wounds, and 2% were from respiratory system infections. Next, we conducted genotyping and tested for beta-lactamase resistance. It was genotyped bacterial isolates using the ERICPCR technique to understand their genetic relationships. The results showed three different patterns. We obtained (E19, E42, E50, E75) from each type, which consists of a group of isolates genetically related to each other on the genetic tree. We found genetic relatedness in isolates (E13, E140, E54, E30, E120, E60) that showed no genetic relatedness (E36, E38). Phenotypical detection revealed the presence of Extended-Spectrum B-Lactamase (ESBLS) beta-lactamase. The Double Disk Synergy Test (DDST) results revealed that E36, E13, E38, E120, and E60, with a percentage of 41.7%, possessed the ability to produce beta-lactamase, while E42, E50, E19, E30, E75, E140, and E54, with a percentage of 58.3%, lacked this ability.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30526/38.2.3744
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genotyping and Beta–Lactamase Production of Escherichia coli Isolated from Different Sources

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Genotyping and Beta–Lactamase Production of Escherichia coli Isolated from Different Sources

article en

Abstract

It was collected 145 samples from a variety of clinical sources, including urinary tract infections, wounds, blood, respiratory tract infections, stool, sputum, and high vaginal swabs, from various hospitals in Baghdad. Following the collection, we conducted microscopic examinations, biochemical examinations, and diagnosis. The Vitek-2 Compact System conducted the final analysis. It was gotten 50 isolates of Escherichia coli, and 34% of those were from urinary tract infections, wounds, respiratory system infections, sputum, and vaginal swabs. 72% of the isolates were from urinary tract infections, 14% were from wounds, and 2% were from respiratory system infections. Next, we conducted genotyping and tested for beta-lactamase resistance. It was genotyped bacterial isolates using the ERICPCR technique to understand their genetic relationships. The results showed three different patterns. We obtained (E19, E42, E50, E75) from each type, which consists of a group of isolates genetically related to each other on the genetic tree. We found genetic relatedness in isolates (E13, E140, E54, E30, E120, E60) that showed no genetic relatedness (E36, E38). Phenotypical detection revealed the presence of Extended-Spectrum B-Lactamase (ESBLS) beta-lactamase. The Double Disk Synergy Test (DDST) results revealed that E36, E13, E38, E120, and E60, with a percentage of 41.7%, possessed the ability to produce beta-lactamase, while E42, E50, E19, E30, E75, E140, and E54, with a percentage of 58.3%, lacked this ability.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Baghdad (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.