Will graduate students engage in unethical uses of GPT? An exploratory study to understand their perceptions

As AI technologies like GPT models continue to reshape various aspects of society, it is imperative to investigate the perceptions and ethical considerations of graduate students regarding GPT’s use in academic settings. This mixed-method exploratory study engaged 21 graduate students through surveys and focus group interviews. The findings revealed: (1) while engagement with GPT was limited and focused, incidents of unethical use were already present; (2) after experimenting with a designated GPT website, participants showed a statistically significant improvement in their Intention to use AI in research, whereas their research self-efficacy, course satisfaction, perception of AI, necessity of AI for career development, and perceived AI future remained unchanged; (3) graduate students are more likely to use GPT for academic misconduct under time pressure and challenging coursework, exacerbated by instructors’ limited AI awareness. The study advocates for clearer definitions of academic misconduct and a concerted effort toward responsible AI use.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30191/ets.202501_28(1).tp04
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will graduate students engage in unethical uses of GPT? An exploratory study to understand their perceptions

3 citations
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

Will graduate students engage in unethical uses of GPT? An exploratory study to understand their perceptions

article en
3 citations

Abstract

As AI technologies like GPT models continue to reshape various aspects of society, it is imperative to investigate the perceptions and ethical considerations of graduate students regarding GPT’s use in academic settings. This mixed-method exploratory study engaged 21 graduate students through surveys and focus group interviews. The findings revealed: (1) while engagement with GPT was limited and focused, incidents of unethical use were already present; (2) after experimenting with a designated GPT website, participants showed a statistically significant improvement in their Intention to use AI in research, whereas their research self-efficacy, course satisfaction, perception of AI, necessity of AI for career development, and perceived AI future remained unchanged; (3) graduate students are more likely to use GPT for academic misconduct under time pressure and challenging coursework, exacerbated by instructors’ limited AI awareness. The study advocates for clearer definitions of academic misconduct and a concerted effort toward responsible AI use.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Will graduate students engage in unethical uses of GPT? An exploratory study to understand their perceptions · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS