Use me wisely: AI-driven assessment for LLM prompting skills development

Prompting with large language model (LLM) powered chatbots, such as ChatGPT, is adopted in a variety of tasks and processes across different domains. Given the intrinsic complexity of LLMs, effective prompting is not as straightforward as anticipated which highlights the need for novel educational and support methods that are both widely accessible and seamlessly integrated into task workflows. However, LLM prompting shows strong dependence on the specific task and domain, reducing the usefulness of generic methods. We intend to investigate if LLM-based methods can support learning assessments using ad-hoc guidelines and an extremely limited number of annotated prompt samples. In our framework, guidelines are transformed into features to be detected in the learners’ prompts. The descriptions of these features, together with annotated sample prompts, are used to create few-shot learning detectors. We compare various configurations of these few-shot detectors testing 3 state-of-the-art LLMs and derived ensemble models. Our experiments are performed using cross-validation on original sample prompts and a specifically collected test set of prompts from task-naive learners. We find a strong impact of the LLMs on our feature list. One of the most recent models, GPT-4, shows promising performance on most of the features. However, some closely connected models (GPT-3, GPT-3.5 Turbo (Instruct)) show different behaviors when classifying features. We highlight the need for further research in light of the possible impact of design choices on the selection of features and detection prompts. Our findings are of relevance for researchers and practitioners in generative AI literacy, as well as researchers in computer-supported learning assessment.

Publication Details

Journal
BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30191/ets.202507_28(3).sp12
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use me wisely: AI-driven assessment for LLM prompting skills development

2 citations
BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

Use me wisely: AI-driven assessment for LLM prompting skills development

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Prompting with large language model (LLM) powered chatbots, such as ChatGPT, is adopted in a variety of tasks and processes across different domains. Given the intrinsic complexity of LLMs, effective prompting is not as straightforward as anticipated which highlights the need for novel educational and support methods that are both widely accessible and seamlessly integrated into task workflows. However, LLM prompting shows strong dependence on the specific task and domain, reducing the usefulness of generic methods. We intend to investigate if LLM-based methods can support learning assessments using ad-hoc guidelines and an extremely limited number of annotated prompt samples. In our framework, guidelines are transformed into features to be detected in the learners’ prompts. The descriptions of these features, together with annotated sample prompts, are used to create few-shot learning detectors. We compare various configurations of these few-shot detectors testing 3 state-of-the-art LLMs and derived ensemble models. Our experiments are performed using cross-validation on original sample prompts and a specifically collected test set of prompts from task-naive learners. We find a strong impact of the LLMs on our feature list. One of the most recent models, GPT-4, shows promising performance on most of the features. However, some closely connected models (GPT-3, GPT-3.5 Turbo (Instruct)) show different behaviors when classifying features. We highlight the need for further research in light of the possible impact of design choices on the selection of features and detection prompts. Our findings are of relevance for researchers and practitioners in generative AI literacy, as well as researchers in computer-supported learning assessment.

BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.