Critical thinking in the age of generative AI: Effects of a short-term experiential learning intervention on EFL learners

The integration of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT has transformed English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education, offering new opportunities for supporting writing, research, and critical inquiry. However, unguided use of AI may foster cognitive passivity and over-reliance, highlighting the need for targeted pedagogical interventions. Grounded in experiential learning theory, this quasi- experimental study, employing a pretest–posttest control group design, evaluated the effectiveness of a 90-minute workshop, the Critical AI Engagement Cycle, in enhancing EFL learners’ critical thinking skills when using ChatGPT. Despite the short duration, the workshop included multiple scaffolded activities designed to stimulate immediate critical reflection. Seventy-two undergraduate and graduate students at a Vietnamese public university participated, with 38 assigned to the experimental group and 34 to the control group. Participants were selected using convenience sampling based on course enrollment and availability. Pre- and post-test results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in overall critical thinking and each of the four subdomains— analytical skills, logical reasoning, evidence evaluation, and open-mindedness—among participants in the experimental group. Notably, the consistent and large effect sizes across all critical thinking subdomains (Cohen’s d = 0.94 to 1.23) underscore the robust impact of the intervention. The experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in post-intervention critical thinking scores, even after controlling for pretest scores, gender, prior AI knowledge, and AI skill level, as confirmed by ANCOVA analyses. The results suggest that even brief, theoretically grounded interventions can significantly enhance critical thinking skills in AI-mediated EFL environments. These findings underscore the importance of evidence-informed practices and highlight the need for explicit critical thinking training to ensure sustainable and responsible educational practices in the age of generative AI.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monash University
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26180/29206823
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical thinking in the age of generative AI: Effects of a short-term experiential learning intervention on EFL learners

Monash University
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Critical thinking in the age of generative AI: Effects of a short-term experiential learning intervention on EFL learners

article en

Abstract

The integration of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT has transformed English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education, offering new opportunities for supporting writing, research, and critical inquiry. However, unguided use of AI may foster cognitive passivity and over-reliance, highlighting the need for targeted pedagogical interventions. Grounded in experiential learning theory, this quasi- experimental study, employing a pretest–posttest control group design, evaluated the effectiveness of a 90-minute workshop, the Critical AI Engagement Cycle, in enhancing EFL learners’ critical thinking skills when using ChatGPT. Despite the short duration, the workshop included multiple scaffolded activities designed to stimulate immediate critical reflection. Seventy-two undergraduate and graduate students at a Vietnamese public university participated, with 38 assigned to the experimental group and 34 to the control group. Participants were selected using convenience sampling based on course enrollment and availability. Pre- and post-test results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in overall critical thinking and each of the four subdomains— analytical skills, logical reasoning, evidence evaluation, and open-mindedness—among participants in the experimental group. Notably, the consistent and large effect sizes across all critical thinking subdomains (Cohen’s d = 0.94 to 1.23) underscore the robust impact of the intervention. The experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in post-intervention critical thinking scores, even after controlling for pretest scores, gender, prior AI knowledge, and AI skill level, as confirmed by ANCOVA analyses. The results suggest that even brief, theoretically grounded interventions can significantly enhance critical thinking skills in AI-mediated EFL environments. These findings underscore the importance of evidence-informed practices and highlight the need for explicit critical thinking training to ensure sustainable and responsible educational practices in the age of generative AI.

Monash University
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.