Transfer Progressivity and Development

With micro panel data from 32 countries including the poorest and the richest in the world we document (i) a negative relationship between the ability to insure consumption against income shocks and economic development and (ii) a negative relationship between the level of transfer progressivity and the stage of economic development. Importantly, our computation of transfer progressivity includes both public and private net transfers across households—e.g. food transfers. Using an overlapping generations model in which agents differ in permanent productivity, face income shocks and accumulate physical and human capital through learning-by-doing (a labor choice), we find that cross-country differences in transfer progressivity go a long way in explaining the larger ability to insure consumption in poor countries than in rich countries. Then, we use our model to assess the role of transfer progressivity in explaining income per capita differences across countries. We find that decreasing progressivity of poor countries to the levels of rich countries increases income per capita of poor countries by 62%. The opposite experiment, using the progressivity of poor countries on rich countries, reduces income per capita of rich countries by 30%. Since a decrease in transfer progressivity increases the incentives to work and accumulate (physical and human capital) while, at the same time, it reduces social insurance and redistribution, a reduction in progressivity is not necessarily welfare improving. For this reason, we also compute the optimal of transfer progressivity for rich and poor countries separately. We find that optimal progressivity is actually similar (for different reasons) across stages of development which implies that the status quo transfer progressivity for poor (rich) countries is too high (low). Reducing the progressivity of poor countries to optimal levels increases the GDP per capita of the poor by 46% and increases their welfare by 14% in consumption equivalent terms.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/fz127bk0941
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transfer Progressivity and Development

Stanford Digital Repository
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Transfer Progressivity and Development

article en

Abstract

With micro panel data from 32 countries including the poorest and the richest in the world we document (i) a negative relationship between the ability to insure consumption against income shocks and economic development and (ii) a negative relationship between the level of transfer progressivity and the stage of economic development. Importantly, our computation of transfer progressivity includes both public and private net transfers across households—e.g. food transfers. Using an overlapping generations model in which agents differ in permanent productivity, face income shocks and accumulate physical and human capital through learning-by-doing (a labor choice), we find that cross-country differences in transfer progressivity go a long way in explaining the larger ability to insure consumption in poor countries than in rich countries. Then, we use our model to assess the role of transfer progressivity in explaining income per capita differences across countries. We find that decreasing progressivity of poor countries to the levels of rich countries increases income per capita of poor countries by 62%. The opposite experiment, using the progressivity of poor countries on rich countries, reduces income per capita of rich countries by 30%. Since a decrease in transfer progressivity increases the incentives to work and accumulate (physical and human capital) while, at the same time, it reduces social insurance and redistribution, a reduction in progressivity is not necessarily welfare improving. For this reason, we also compute the optimal of transfer progressivity for rich and poor countries separately. We find that optimal progressivity is actually similar (for different reasons) across stages of development which implies that the status quo transfer progressivity for poor (rich) countries is too high (low). Reducing the progressivity of poor countries to optimal levels increases the GDP per capita of the poor by 46% and increases their welfare by 14% in consumption equivalent terms.

Stanford Digital Repository
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.