The Impeding Role of Initial Unrealistic Goal-Setting on Training Performance: Identifying Underpinning Self-Regulatory Processes and Solutions

The importance of goal-setting within training for enhancing performance has been touted in the literature. Goal-setting theory suggests that setting a moderately difficult, specific goal results in a modest goal-performance discrepancy between the trainee's goal and actual performance level. Such a discrepancy has been found to enhance subsequent performance, as the trainee will employ greater effort and task engagement to resolve the discrepancy. However, research has also shown that the motivating effect of a discrepancy will reverse with repeated feedback indicating that one's performance has fallen short of the desired goal. To date, no prior research has examined the effect that a single large goal-performance discrepancy has on subsequent performance. This study sought to elucidate this relationship, its underlying mechanisms, as well as provide a remedy for mitigating this hypothesized negative effect. Data collected from 206 undergraduate participants, who completed a videogame-based training program, were used to test the study hypotheses. As hypothesized, a large initial goal-performance discrepancy was found to have a negative impact on subsequent performance; however, the hypothesized role of self-regulation as the mechanism underlying this relationship was not supported. These results suggest that during the initial stages of training, training performance was hindered for trainees who set unrealistically difficult goals and thus failed to reach their self-set goal. Unrealistic self set goals may negate the organization's monetary investment in the training. Fortunately, this study also demonstrated a simple solution; providing goal-setting advisement was found to help trainees successfully set lower, more accurate, initial goals and therefore experience a lower goal-performance discrepancy, as compared to trainees who did not receive the advisement. Additional practical implications and future directions are discussed.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/gtd7-bg33
Primary Topic
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impeding Role of Initial Unrealistic Goal-Setting on Training Performance: Identifying Underpinning Self-Regulatory Processes and Solutions

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
article

The Impeding Role of Initial Unrealistic Goal-Setting on Training Performance: Identifying Underpinning Self-Regulatory Processes and Solutions

article en

Abstract

The importance of goal-setting within training for enhancing performance has been touted in the literature. Goal-setting theory suggests that setting a moderately difficult, specific goal results in a modest goal-performance discrepancy between the trainee's goal and actual performance level. Such a discrepancy has been found to enhance subsequent performance, as the trainee will employ greater effort and task engagement to resolve the discrepancy. However, research has also shown that the motivating effect of a discrepancy will reverse with repeated feedback indicating that one's performance has fallen short of the desired goal. To date, no prior research has examined the effect that a single large goal-performance discrepancy has on subsequent performance. This study sought to elucidate this relationship, its underlying mechanisms, as well as provide a remedy for mitigating this hypothesized negative effect. Data collected from 206 undergraduate participants, who completed a videogame-based training program, were used to test the study hypotheses. As hypothesized, a large initial goal-performance discrepancy was found to have a negative impact on subsequent performance; however, the hypothesized role of self-regulation as the mechanism underlying this relationship was not supported. These results suggest that during the initial stages of training, training performance was hindered for trainees who set unrealistically difficult goals and thus failed to reach their self-set goal. Unrealistic self set goals may negate the organization's monetary investment in the training. Fortunately, this study also demonstrated a simple solution; providing goal-setting advisement was found to help trainees successfully set lower, more accurate, initial goals and therefore experience a lower goal-performance discrepancy, as compared to trainees who did not receive the advisement. Additional practical implications and future directions are discussed.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impeding Role of Initial Unrealistic Goal-Setting on Training Performance: Identifying Underpinning Self-Regulatory Processes and Solutions · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS