Pedestrian Crossing Environmental Impact Statement

Logan, Utah is divided by US Highway 89/91, which bisects much of the city. This makes it difficult to pass to the other side without a vehicle. A pedestrian crossing has been proposed to connect the eastern and western sides of Logan without impacting traffic flow. The Environmental Impact Statement aims to look at reasonable alternatives and identify many resources that will be affected by its implementation. Four main alternatives were considered: an underpass, an overpass with an elevator, an overpass with a ramp, and the no-change alternative to be used as a baseline alternative. The underpass is the preferred alternative based on sustainability, cost, maintenance, and pedestrian traffic usage. Some of the major negative impacts of the pedestrian crossing include right-of-way acquisition, hydrology impacts, water quality, and noise-and-vibration impacts. Some of the major positive impacts are increased pedestrian facilities and increased socioeconomic potential. These resources were then analyzed for cumulative impacts over time and space to show how they will impact the future of the project site and beyond. After a thorough analysis, the underpass is still the best alternative for the location.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26076/beac-3bf0
Primary Topic
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedestrian Crossing Environmental Impact Statement

Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
article

Pedestrian Crossing Environmental Impact Statement

article en

Abstract

Logan, Utah is divided by US Highway 89/91, which bisects much of the city. This makes it difficult to pass to the other side without a vehicle. A pedestrian crossing has been proposed to connect the eastern and western sides of Logan without impacting traffic flow. The Environmental Impact Statement aims to look at reasonable alternatives and identify many resources that will be affected by its implementation. Four main alternatives were considered: an underpass, an overpass with an elevator, an overpass with a ramp, and the no-change alternative to be used as a baseline alternative. The underpass is the preferred alternative based on sustainability, cost, maintenance, and pedestrian traffic usage. Some of the major negative impacts of the pedestrian crossing include right-of-way acquisition, hydrology impacts, water quality, and noise-and-vibration impacts. Some of the major positive impacts are increased pedestrian facilities and increased socioeconomic potential. These resources were then analyzed for cumulative impacts over time and space to show how they will impact the future of the project site and beyond. After a thorough analysis, the underpass is still the best alternative for the location.

Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pedestrian Crossing Environmental Impact Statement · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS