Stress-Counter Response Training: Flight Simulation ANS Biofeedback

Many attempts to reduce Human Error (HE) in aviation have been applied in the past. However, HE remains the largest reported cause of accidents and incidents in aviation. The present study was designed to implement a novel training method to produce voluntary control over the autonomic nervous system (ANS). Twenty-one participants flew a PC based F-16 flight simulator. There were three conditions: 1. Stress-Counter Response training (SCR), 2, traditional biofeedback training, and 3. A control. It was hypothesized that the SCR training group would show improved physiological control, better flight performance, and lower subjective workload ratings compared to the other two groups under non-normal, or stressful flight conditions. It was established that the present study failed to provide any clear evidence for an effect of the tested technology for reducing pilot error by training individuals to control ANS reactivity in simulated flight tasks. However, the lack of a significant training effect may have been due to several possibilities. In fact, a number of complexities were identified in the course of this research.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/1xg7-fd64
Primary Topic
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress-Counter Response Training: Flight Simulation ANS Biofeedback

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
article

Stress-Counter Response Training: Flight Simulation ANS Biofeedback

article en

Abstract

Many attempts to reduce Human Error (HE) in aviation have been applied in the past. However, HE remains the largest reported cause of accidents and incidents in aviation. The present study was designed to implement a novel training method to produce voluntary control over the autonomic nervous system (ANS). Twenty-one participants flew a PC based F-16 flight simulator. There were three conditions: 1. Stress-Counter Response training (SCR), 2, traditional biofeedback training, and 3. A control. It was hypothesized that the SCR training group would show improved physiological control, better flight performance, and lower subjective workload ratings compared to the other two groups under non-normal, or stressful flight conditions. It was established that the present study failed to provide any clear evidence for an effect of the tested technology for reducing pilot error by training individuals to control ANS reactivity in simulated flight tasks. However, the lack of a significant training effect may have been due to several possibilities. In fact, a number of complexities were identified in the course of this research.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stress-Counter Response Training: Flight Simulation ANS Biofeedback · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS