Behavior of a phase field model for wetting on structured surfaces

Technical surfaces are generally not perfectly smooth, but usually exhibit roughness. Additionally, as micro production techniques continue to evolve, geometrical surface structures at the micro scale can be manufactured, which presents a challenge for wetting models that are commonly formulated for smooth surfaces. A phase field model for surface wetting, proposed by Diewald et al., serves as a basis for this investigation. On smooth surfaces, the width of the gas‐liquid interface can be widened for scale bridging purposes, as this allows for accurate computations on coarse grids. However, it was observed that this interface scaling impacts the results when the model is applied to rough surfaces, and therefore a free choice of the interface width is not always sensible. In this work, the ability of the model to deal with sinusoidally shaped surfaces is investigated. An Allen–Cahn evolution equation is used to determine static equilibrium configurations for droplets on such surfaces.

Publication Details

Journal
TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26083/tuprints-00029032
Primary Topic
Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavior of a phase field model for wetting on structured surfaces

TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt)
Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
article

Behavior of a phase field model for wetting on structured surfaces

article en

Abstract

Technical surfaces are generally not perfectly smooth, but usually exhibit roughness. Additionally, as micro production techniques continue to evolve, geometrical surface structures at the micro scale can be manufactured, which presents a challenge for wetting models that are commonly formulated for smooth surfaces. A phase field model for surface wetting, proposed by Diewald et al., serves as a basis for this investigation. On smooth surfaces, the width of the gas‐liquid interface can be widened for scale bridging purposes, as this allows for accurate computations on coarse grids. However, it was observed that this interface scaling impacts the results when the model is applied to rough surfaces, and therefore a free choice of the interface width is not always sensible. In this work, the ability of the model to deal with sinusoidally shaped surfaces is investigated. An Allen–Cahn evolution equation is used to determine static equilibrium configurations for droplets on such surfaces.

TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.