Missing Our Own Audience: The Perceptions of Audience in the Composition Classroom

Although considered a critical part of the writing process by scholars such as Lisa Ede and Andrea Lunsford, the concept of audience is elusive when actually looking for its presence in composition classrooms. Many instructors believe that they provide a framework for understanding and valuing audience awareness in writing but then do not understand when student writing does not show these connections. This raises the question of how audience is being taught in the classroom. The purpose of this study is to determine how audience is being addressed as a pedagogical framework in first year composition classrooms by instructors as well as how these instructors' students perceive and value audience in their academic and non-academic writing. As it has been argued that writing creates history, documents such as syllabi, assignment sheets, and rubrics from first year composition classrooms are analyzed using grounded theory in order to understand how audience is being addressed in these classrooms. Although a theory cannot be constructed due to limited data, the documents provided a four points of analyses on how the concept of audience is being incorporated into some pedagogies. First, instructors are asking students to engage with an audience but are rarely asking the students to construct their own audience; rather, the instructors assign an audience that students should engage. Second, instructors and students are focusing on both audiences that are addressed, or real, and invoked, or imaginary as Ede and Lunsford define. Third, instructors and students are sharing the responsibility of agency. Fourth and finally, instructors are providing direct language rather than implying in their documents, which allows for students to understand without making inferences on meaning. In addition, using a phenomenological study, student perceptions and values of audience are collected and then analyzed through surveying students currently enrolled in first year composition classrooms. Surveys indicated that students primarily focus on the instructor as the audience. As well, the audience is valued when students compose in the academic setting but not when composing in the non-academic setting. Lastly, analysis of the surveys indicated that the confidence level of the writer was proportional to the value placed on audience awareness.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/pm10-1022
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Missing Our Own Audience: The Perceptions of Audience in the Composition Classroom

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Missing Our Own Audience: The Perceptions of Audience in the Composition Classroom

article en

Abstract

Although considered a critical part of the writing process by scholars such as Lisa Ede and Andrea Lunsford, the concept of audience is elusive when actually looking for its presence in composition classrooms. Many instructors believe that they provide a framework for understanding and valuing audience awareness in writing but then do not understand when student writing does not show these connections. This raises the question of how audience is being taught in the classroom. The purpose of this study is to determine how audience is being addressed as a pedagogical framework in first year composition classrooms by instructors as well as how these instructors' students perceive and value audience in their academic and non-academic writing. As it has been argued that writing creates history, documents such as syllabi, assignment sheets, and rubrics from first year composition classrooms are analyzed using grounded theory in order to understand how audience is being addressed in these classrooms. Although a theory cannot be constructed due to limited data, the documents provided a four points of analyses on how the concept of audience is being incorporated into some pedagogies. First, instructors are asking students to engage with an audience but are rarely asking the students to construct their own audience; rather, the instructors assign an audience that students should engage. Second, instructors and students are focusing on both audiences that are addressed, or real, and invoked, or imaginary as Ede and Lunsford define. Third, instructors and students are sharing the responsibility of agency. Fourth and finally, instructors are providing direct language rather than implying in their documents, which allows for students to understand without making inferences on meaning. In addition, using a phenomenological study, student perceptions and values of audience are collected and then analyzed through surveying students currently enrolled in first year composition classrooms. Surveys indicated that students primarily focus on the instructor as the audience. As well, the audience is valued when students compose in the academic setting but not when composing in the non-academic setting. Lastly, analysis of the surveys indicated that the confidence level of the writer was proportional to the value placed on audience awareness.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.