The Effects of Task Experience, Goal Setting, and Knowledge of Results on Performance and Task-Goal Attributes

Two laboratory studies were conducted to determine the relationships between task-goal attributes and the necessary and sufficient conditions for goal setting and knowledge of results (KR) to influence task performance. The first study tested the effects of task experience and goal setting on performance of an arithmetic computation task. Perceived goal difficulty, effort, expectancy of goal attainment, and goal acceptance were assessed with a questionnaire. The results demonstrated that only goals influenced effort and perceived goal difficulty, while task experience and goals influenced expectancy of goal attainment and goal acceptance. The relationships between these variables indicated that as effort and perceived goal difficulty increased significantly across goal levels, expectancy of goal attainment and goal acceptance decreased significantly. In the second study, the results demonstrated that KR and a goal of "do your best" were sufficient to significantly increase performance in relation to receiving no KR and a goal of "do your best." This finding was attributed to an independent motivational effect from evaluation apprehension for the KR/"do your best" group and the incorporation of controls for initial task ability and past performance. The relationship between task experience, initial task ability, and task-goal attributes were discussed with the implication for future research that initial task ability and task experience need to be controlled to assess accurately the relationships between goal setting, task-goal attributes, and performance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/4n3k-k436
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Task Experience, Goal Setting, and Knowledge of Results on Performance and Task-Goal Attributes

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

The Effects of Task Experience, Goal Setting, and Knowledge of Results on Performance and Task-Goal Attributes

article en

Abstract

Two laboratory studies were conducted to determine the relationships between task-goal attributes and the necessary and sufficient conditions for goal setting and knowledge of results (KR) to influence task performance. The first study tested the effects of task experience and goal setting on performance of an arithmetic computation task. Perceived goal difficulty, effort, expectancy of goal attainment, and goal acceptance were assessed with a questionnaire. The results demonstrated that only goals influenced effort and perceived goal difficulty, while task experience and goals influenced expectancy of goal attainment and goal acceptance. The relationships between these variables indicated that as effort and perceived goal difficulty increased significantly across goal levels, expectancy of goal attainment and goal acceptance decreased significantly. In the second study, the results demonstrated that KR and a goal of "do your best" were sufficient to significantly increase performance in relation to receiving no KR and a goal of "do your best." This finding was attributed to an independent motivational effect from evaluation apprehension for the KR/"do your best" group and the incorporation of controls for initial task ability and past performance. The relationship between task experience, initial task ability, and task-goal attributes were discussed with the implication for future research that initial task ability and task experience need to be controlled to assess accurately the relationships between goal setting, task-goal attributes, and performance.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.