Relationship between analytical imprecision and coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of the calibration curve

Quantitative measurement procedures rely on calibration curves, which describe the relationship between known concentrations from the calibrator material and signal intensity from the instrument, for the estimation of measurand concentration. In cases where a calibration curve is defined by a linear regression fit, acceptability criteria to determine if a calibration curve is suitable for patient reporting include a coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of ≥ 0.99 or ≥ 0.995. However, it is unclear if such a universal criterion for R<sup>2</sup> is suitable for different analytical imprecision and measurement range profiles. Here, we examined the relationship between analytical imprecision and coefficient of determination when applied to a linear regression calibration curve.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Singapore Institute of Technology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25447/sit.29587322
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship between analytical imprecision and coefficient of determination (R2) of the calibration curve

Singapore Institute of Technology
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Relationship between analytical imprecision and coefficient of determination (R2) of the calibration curve

article en

Abstract

Quantitative measurement procedures rely on calibration curves, which describe the relationship between known concentrations from the calibrator material and signal intensity from the instrument, for the estimation of measurand concentration. In cases where a calibration curve is defined by a linear regression fit, acceptability criteria to determine if a calibration curve is suitable for patient reporting include a coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of ≥ 0.99 or ≥ 0.995. However, it is unclear if such a universal criterion for R<sup>2</sup> is suitable for different analytical imprecision and measurement range profiles. Here, we examined the relationship between analytical imprecision and coefficient of determination when applied to a linear regression calibration curve.

Singapore Institute of Technology
Singapore Institute of Technology (SG), University Health System (US), National University Health System (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relationship between analytical imprecision and coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of the calibration curve · Singapore Institute of Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS