Intellectual property at a crossroads: The knowledge and resources of indigenous peoples and local communities

On 24 May 2024, Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) adopted the Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge. While lauded as a victory for Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLC), in this article we critique both the Treaty and its deficiencies, as well concerns of opponents of the Treaty. In addition, this article examines various ways forward in the plight of IPLC to protect their knowledge and knowledge systems, comparing and contrasting Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia and the United States, as three jurisdictions with comparable British colonial histories, but across the spectrum in terms of how their intellectual property law doctrines meet the interests of IPLC. The article warns that the Treaty might distract from meeting the deeper interests of IPLC and also that the typical paths forward are not without their disadvantages, including potentially perpetuating colonial constructs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25455/wgtn.29497223
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intellectual property at a crossroads: The knowledge and resources of indigenous peoples and local communities

Figshare
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Intellectual property at a crossroads: The knowledge and resources of indigenous peoples and local communities

article en

Abstract

On 24 May 2024, Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) adopted the Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge. While lauded as a victory for Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLC), in this article we critique both the Treaty and its deficiencies, as well concerns of opponents of the Treaty. In addition, this article examines various ways forward in the plight of IPLC to protect their knowledge and knowledge systems, comparing and contrasting Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia and the United States, as three jurisdictions with comparable British colonial histories, but across the spectrum in terms of how their intellectual property law doctrines meet the interests of IPLC. The article warns that the Treaty might distract from meeting the deeper interests of IPLC and also that the typical paths forward are not without their disadvantages, including potentially perpetuating colonial constructs.

Figshare
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.