Home the Final Frontier:Why Privacy means Protecting Workers' Rights to Time and Space

This article critiques the failure of current privacy frameworks to protect workers—especially teleworkers—from the growing encroachment of employer surveillance into their homes. It argues that prevailing privacy regimes, including notice-and-choice models and the GDPR, inadequately address the systemic power asymmetries in the employment relationship, often enabling rather than restricting invasive monitoring. Drawing from labor law traditions, the authors propose a rights-centered framework that views time and space as essential for human dignity and autonomy. They call for a non-negotiable floor of protections, including surveillance-free periods, bans on data commodification, and the establishment of an enforcement inspectorate. By reframing privacy not as a transactional good but as a fundamental labor right, the article advocates for pragmatic legal reforms that counteract the exploitation of home-based workers in a data-driven economy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25455/wgtn.29115245
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Home the Final Frontier:Why Privacy means Protecting Workers' Rights to Time and Space

Figshare
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Home the Final Frontier:Why Privacy means Protecting Workers' Rights to Time and Space

article en

Abstract

This article critiques the failure of current privacy frameworks to protect workers—especially teleworkers—from the growing encroachment of employer surveillance into their homes. It argues that prevailing privacy regimes, including notice-and-choice models and the GDPR, inadequately address the systemic power asymmetries in the employment relationship, often enabling rather than restricting invasive monitoring. Drawing from labor law traditions, the authors propose a rights-centered framework that views time and space as essential for human dignity and autonomy. They call for a non-negotiable floor of protections, including surveillance-free periods, bans on data commodification, and the establishment of an enforcement inspectorate. By reframing privacy not as a transactional good but as a fundamental labor right, the article advocates for pragmatic legal reforms that counteract the exploitation of home-based workers in a data-driven economy.

Figshare
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.