ENHANCING LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION PARAMETER ESTIMATION WITH HYBRID BAYESIAN AVERAGE MODEL FOR FUZZY DATA

With the ultimate goal of increasing parameter estimate accuracy, this study will examine and assess a number of estimating techniques used with the Lindley distribution in the context of fuzzy data. Gibbs sampling, Bootstrapping Sampling, MCMC, MH, and a unique hybrid methodology that combines these approaches via Bayesian model averaging were also studied. The research looks at several sample sizes ranging from 15 to 100 and repeats the estimate method 10,000 times for each size. Fuzzy data are created using established fuzzy systems, and the performance of each approach is measured using average values (AV), mean squared errors (MSE), coverage probabilities, and confidence interval lengths. The findings show that the hybrid technique consistently produces estimates closer to the genuine parameter value of one across all sample sizes, with smaller mean squared errors than individual methods. Furthermore, the hybrid method’s confidence intervals preserve coverage probabilities that are consistent with the targeted confidence level, demonstrating the method’s trustworthiness in statistical inference. Overall, the results show that the hybrid technique improves estimate accuracy and reliability, providing a strong foundation for parameter estimation in the Lindley distribution framework using fuzzy data.

Publication Details

Journal
cyberleninka.ru
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24412/1932-2321-2025-182-528-542
Primary Topic
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ENHANCING LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION PARAMETER ESTIMATION WITH HYBRID BAYESIAN AVERAGE MODEL FOR FUZZY DATA

cyberleninka.ru
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
article

ENHANCING LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION PARAMETER ESTIMATION WITH HYBRID BAYESIAN AVERAGE MODEL FOR FUZZY DATA

article en

Abstract

With the ultimate goal of increasing parameter estimate accuracy, this study will examine and assess a number of estimating techniques used with the Lindley distribution in the context of fuzzy data. Gibbs sampling, Bootstrapping Sampling, MCMC, MH, and a unique hybrid methodology that combines these approaches via Bayesian model averaging were also studied. The research looks at several sample sizes ranging from 15 to 100 and repeats the estimate method 10,000 times for each size. Fuzzy data are created using established fuzzy systems, and the performance of each approach is measured using average values (AV), mean squared errors (MSE), coverage probabilities, and confidence interval lengths. The findings show that the hybrid technique consistently produces estimates closer to the genuine parameter value of one across all sample sizes, with smaller mean squared errors than individual methods. Furthermore, the hybrid method’s confidence intervals preserve coverage probabilities that are consistent with the targeted confidence level, demonstrating the method’s trustworthiness in statistical inference. Overall, the results show that the hybrid technique improves estimate accuracy and reliability, providing a strong foundation for parameter estimation in the Lindley distribution framework using fuzzy data.

cyberleninka.ru
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ENHANCING LINDLEY DISTRIBUTION PARAMETER ESTIMATION WITH HYBRID BAYESIAN AVERAGE MODEL FOR FUZZY DATA · cyberleninka.ru (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS