The measurement of (dis-)embedded identification

This article introduces and examines novel measures for generally applicable and insightful forms of collective identification, namely embedded identification and dis-embedded identification, which describe specific constellations of identification with a subordinate ingroup and the respective superordinate (in)group. The measure development process was guided by social identity theory and self-categorization theory, by items employed in previous research, and by empirical research addressing or containing measures of collective identification. In two samples, the young generation in Germany and Muslims in England, the measures showed no problematic characteristics, decent reliability, decent corrected item-total correlations, basic construct validity, as well as metric invariance across both samples. The presented findings hold implications for further research, as the measures provide a reliable and valid option to measure novel forms of collective identification of major interest and relevance for the comprehension of intergroup processes and conflicts in modern and plural societies. Detailed information is provided to enable replication, further use, and further development of the presented measures.

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Archives
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16290
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The measurement of (dis-)embedded identification

Psychology Archives
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

The measurement of (dis-)embedded identification

article en

Abstract

This article introduces and examines novel measures for generally applicable and insightful forms of collective identification, namely embedded identification and dis-embedded identification, which describe specific constellations of identification with a subordinate ingroup and the respective superordinate (in)group. The measure development process was guided by social identity theory and self-categorization theory, by items employed in previous research, and by empirical research addressing or containing measures of collective identification. In two samples, the young generation in Germany and Muslims in England, the measures showed no problematic characteristics, decent reliability, decent corrected item-total correlations, basic construct validity, as well as metric invariance across both samples. The presented findings hold implications for further research, as the measures provide a reliable and valid option to measure novel forms of collective identification of major interest and relevance for the comprehension of intergroup processes and conflicts in modern and plural societies. Detailed information is provided to enable replication, further use, and further development of the presented measures.

Psychology Archives
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.