Reliability analysis and life cycle costing of rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) system operating in a composite environment

Solar PhotoVoltaic (PV) systems are becoming increasingly common, so it is critical to understand how system or component failure impacts lifetime costs. Reliability analysis uses historical performance data to help identify equipment or systems that perform badly. A case study of solar PV systems’ dependability and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) analysis is presented in this research. Manufacturers and consumers of solar PV systems provide the information needed for reliability study. This research incorporates reliability analysis into the assessment of rooftop solar PV systems’ LCCs in a composite climate. Failure and maintenance costs are a major contributor to total LCC, as demonstrated by estimating failure rates using Weibull++ modeling. ReliaSoft’s Weibull++ software is used to estimate the best-fit failure distribution. Initial expenses, failure, Operation and Maintenance (O&M), and net salvage value are the categories into which the lifetime costs are divided. According to the analysis, inverters and balance-of-system elements are important sources of cost. The Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) of earthing and grounding, DC CB, IGBT, AC CB, Grid, AC converter, relay, inverter, cooling fan, and SMBUS communication components is lower; however, since they need only modest repairs, this expense is covered by routine inspection. Understanding how costs affect a product’s whole life cycle is made easier with the use of the LCC study. The cost of O&M accounts for around 74% of the overall LCC. Thus, it may be inferred that the LCC of the solar PV system was driven by O&M and failure costs. It gives the user an idea that O&M expenses associated with panel cleaning can be substituted by manual cleaning for small solar PV systems like those examined in this paper. Since failure costs are lower than O&M costs, it is possible to lower this cost by scheduling an ideal technician visit for routine inspection. The results indicate that PV system sustainability can be improved by implementing cost-effective technologies and optimizing maintenance procedures. Long-term performance monitoring, battery storage integration, and circular economy methods for recycling PV components should be the main topics of future research.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2516/stet/2025012/pdf
Primary Topic
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability analysis and life cycle costing of rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) system operating in a composite environment

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
article

Reliability analysis and life cycle costing of rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) system operating in a composite environment

article en

Abstract

Solar PhotoVoltaic (PV) systems are becoming increasingly common, so it is critical to understand how system or component failure impacts lifetime costs. Reliability analysis uses historical performance data to help identify equipment or systems that perform badly. A case study of solar PV systems’ dependability and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) analysis is presented in this research. Manufacturers and consumers of solar PV systems provide the information needed for reliability study. This research incorporates reliability analysis into the assessment of rooftop solar PV systems’ LCCs in a composite climate. Failure and maintenance costs are a major contributor to total LCC, as demonstrated by estimating failure rates using Weibull++ modeling. ReliaSoft’s Weibull++ software is used to estimate the best-fit failure distribution. Initial expenses, failure, Operation and Maintenance (O&M), and net salvage value are the categories into which the lifetime costs are divided. According to the analysis, inverters and balance-of-system elements are important sources of cost. The Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) of earthing and grounding, DC CB, IGBT, AC CB, Grid, AC converter, relay, inverter, cooling fan, and SMBUS communication components is lower; however, since they need only modest repairs, this expense is covered by routine inspection. Understanding how costs affect a product’s whole life cycle is made easier with the use of the LCC study. The cost of O&M accounts for around 74% of the overall LCC. Thus, it may be inferred that the LCC of the solar PV system was driven by O&M and failure costs. It gives the user an idea that O&M expenses associated with panel cleaning can be substituted by manual cleaning for small solar PV systems like those examined in this paper. Since failure costs are lower than O&M costs, it is possible to lower this cost by scheduling an ideal technician visit for routine inspection. The results indicate that PV system sustainability can be improved by implementing cost-effective technologies and optimizing maintenance procedures. Long-term performance monitoring, battery storage integration, and circular economy methods for recycling PV components should be the main topics of future research.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reliability analysis and life cycle costing of rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) system operating in a composite environment · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS