The Ontological Difference in Heidegger's Thought: A Solution to the Puzzle of the Relationship between Being, entities, and Dasein in Being and Time

This paper examines three seemingly inconsistent passages in Martin Heidegger's Being and Time that pertain to the relationship between Being, entities, and Dasein. The apparent inconsistency arises from Heidegger's assertion that, on the one hand, entities are independent of Dasein, while on the other hand, Being is dependent on Dasein's understanding. This paper aims to resolve this apparent inconsistency by introducing and analyzing the ontological difference between Being and entities, which is a central concept in Heidegger's philosophy. By exploring Heidegger's critiques of traditional realist and idealist approaches and focusing on his analysis of Dasein as “being in the world” and relating to other entities, it is demonstrated that these three passages are entirely compatible within the framework of Heidegger's ontology. Since the mode of existence of Dasein as transcendence serves as the foundation of ontological difference, understanding all modes of being of entities (and not the entities themselves), including independence and dependence, is rooted in Dasein.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2024.64180.3901
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ontological Difference in Heidegger's Thought: A Solution to the Puzzle of the Relationship between Being, entities, and Dasein in Being and Time

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

The Ontological Difference in Heidegger's Thought: A Solution to the Puzzle of the Relationship between Being, entities, and Dasein in Being and Time

article en

Abstract

This paper examines three seemingly inconsistent passages in Martin Heidegger's Being and Time that pertain to the relationship between Being, entities, and Dasein. The apparent inconsistency arises from Heidegger's assertion that, on the one hand, entities are independent of Dasein, while on the other hand, Being is dependent on Dasein's understanding. This paper aims to resolve this apparent inconsistency by introducing and analyzing the ontological difference between Being and entities, which is a central concept in Heidegger's philosophy. By exploring Heidegger's critiques of traditional realist and idealist approaches and focusing on his analysis of Dasein as “being in the world” and relating to other entities, it is demonstrated that these three passages are entirely compatible within the framework of Heidegger's ontology. Since the mode of existence of Dasein as transcendence serves as the foundation of ontological difference, understanding all modes of being of entities (and not the entities themselves), including independence and dependence, is rooted in Dasein.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.