Ultrasonographic abdominal visceral fat thickness as an independent predictive factor of mortality in COVID-19 patients; a prospective cohort study

Background: Visceral fat has been associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes due to its pro-inflammatory effects. While computed tomography (CT) is the standard for measuring visceral fat, ultrasound (US) offers a non-invasive and accessible alternative. This study aimed to evaluate whether abdominal fat thickness measured via US predicts clinical outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia. Method: This prospective cohort study included 83 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Visceral fat thickness (VFT), subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), and preperitoneal fat thickness (PFT) was measured with US. The primary outcome of interest was mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze associations, adjusting for confounders such as age, sex and comorbidities. Results: 83 patients with the median age of 62 (IQR: 49–73) years were included (53% male). Mortality was significantly higher in male (61.4% vs. 38.6%, p = 0.018); older age (73.5 vs. 59.5; p = 0.003); patients with lower median blood oxygen saturation (80% vs. 88%, p < 0.001), higher median levels of AST (66 vs. 39.5, p = 0.002), BUN (67 vs. 36.5, p < 0.001), and creatinine (1.6 vs. 1.2, p < 0.001); and patients under mechanical ventilation (p < 0.01). Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis the independent predictors of mortality were VFT (aOR: 1.025, 95% CI: 1.001–1.051, p = 0.047), old age (aOR: 1.064, 95% CI: 1.016–1.115, p = 0.008), and male sex (aOR: 4.430, 95% CI: 1.169–16.769, p = 0.029). In contrast, SFT had an aOR of 1.059 (95% CI: 0.966–1.161, p = 0.223), and PFT had an aOR of 1.016 (95% CI: 0.880–1.172, p = 0.830), neither of which were statistically significant. The area under the ROC curve of VFT in predicting mortality was 0.643. The optimal cutoff value for VFT, determined using the Youden Index, was 80.4. At this cutoff point, the sensitivity was 52.2% while the specificity was 75.0%. Conclusion: It seems that, ultrasound-measured VFT is a potential predictor of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, offering a cost-effective and accessible tool for risk assessment. Further research is needed to confirm its broader applicability.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22037/ijem.v11i1.48468
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasonographic abdominal visceral fat thickness as an independent predictive factor of mortality in COVID-19 patients; a prospective cohort study

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Ultrasonographic abdominal visceral fat thickness as an independent predictive factor of mortality in COVID-19 patients; a prospective cohort study

article en

Abstract

Background: Visceral fat has been associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes due to its pro-inflammatory effects. While computed tomography (CT) is the standard for measuring visceral fat, ultrasound (US) offers a non-invasive and accessible alternative. This study aimed to evaluate whether abdominal fat thickness measured via US predicts clinical outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia. Method: This prospective cohort study included 83 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Visceral fat thickness (VFT), subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), and preperitoneal fat thickness (PFT) was measured with US. The primary outcome of interest was mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze associations, adjusting for confounders such as age, sex and comorbidities. Results: 83 patients with the median age of 62 (IQR: 49–73) years were included (53% male). Mortality was significantly higher in male (61.4% vs. 38.6%, p = 0.018); older age (73.5 vs. 59.5; p = 0.003); patients with lower median blood oxygen saturation (80% vs. 88%, p < 0.001), higher median levels of AST (66 vs. 39.5, p = 0.002), BUN (67 vs. 36.5, p < 0.001), and creatinine (1.6 vs. 1.2, p < 0.001); and patients under mechanical ventilation (p < 0.01). Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis the independent predictors of mortality were VFT (aOR: 1.025, 95% CI: 1.001–1.051, p = 0.047), old age (aOR: 1.064, 95% CI: 1.016–1.115, p = 0.008), and male sex (aOR: 4.430, 95% CI: 1.169–16.769, p = 0.029). In contrast, SFT had an aOR of 1.059 (95% CI: 0.966–1.161, p = 0.223), and PFT had an aOR of 1.016 (95% CI: 0.880–1.172, p = 0.830), neither of which were statistically significant. The area under the ROC curve of VFT in predicting mortality was 0.643. The optimal cutoff value for VFT, determined using the Youden Index, was 80.4. At this cutoff point, the sensitivity was 52.2% while the specificity was 75.0%. Conclusion: It seems that, ultrasound-measured VFT is a potential predictor of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, offering a cost-effective and accessible tool for risk assessment. Further research is needed to confirm its broader applicability.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.