Lung injury from Chest Tubes and Applied Suction: A Scoping Review.

Background: This is a scoping review aimed to investigate the incidence and nature of lung injury resulting from thoracostomy procedures, with a specific focus on the use of suction. Currently, there is very sparse evidence on this research topic and what is available is outdated. Therefore, this review aimed to identify gaps in the literature and provide a comprehensive overview of the complications and impact of chest tubes and suction. Methods: The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation were used to guide this scoping review. The scoping review also utilised a mixed methodological approach, reviewing both quantitative and qualitative literature. Results: The scoping review identified a range of factors contributing to lung injury from thoracostomy, including patient positioning, equipment and technique, complications of tube thoracostomy, and the use of suction. The findings highlighted significant gaps in knowledge and emphasised the need for further research into tube thoracostomy causing lung injury and the safety and efficacy of negative pressure suction. Conclusions: The scoping review concluded that there are gaps in the literature based on the association between lung injury and tube thoracostomy. There is also a lack of robust evidence supporting the use of suction and the potential complications of this. Furthermore, the need for clinical standardisation, training, and education to mitigate complications associated with thoracostomy procedures has been highlighted. This scoping review provides a rationale for future research and guidance on clinical practice in this area.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Kent
Published
2025-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22024/unikent/03/ajpp.1172
Primary Topic
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lung injury from Chest Tubes and Applied Suction: A Scoping Review.

University of Kent
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
article

Lung injury from Chest Tubes and Applied Suction: A Scoping Review.

article en

Abstract

Background: This is a scoping review aimed to investigate the incidence and nature of lung injury resulting from thoracostomy procedures, with a specific focus on the use of suction. Currently, there is very sparse evidence on this research topic and what is available is outdated. Therefore, this review aimed to identify gaps in the literature and provide a comprehensive overview of the complications and impact of chest tubes and suction. Methods: The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation were used to guide this scoping review. The scoping review also utilised a mixed methodological approach, reviewing both quantitative and qualitative literature. Results: The scoping review identified a range of factors contributing to lung injury from thoracostomy, including patient positioning, equipment and technique, complications of tube thoracostomy, and the use of suction. The findings highlighted significant gaps in knowledge and emphasised the need for further research into tube thoracostomy causing lung injury and the safety and efficacy of negative pressure suction. Conclusions: The scoping review concluded that there are gaps in the literature based on the association between lung injury and tube thoracostomy. There is also a lack of robust evidence supporting the use of suction and the potential complications of this. Furthermore, the need for clinical standardisation, training, and education to mitigate complications associated with thoracostomy procedures has been highlighted. This scoping review provides a rationale for future research and guidance on clinical practice in this area.

University of Kent
Medway School of Pharmacy (GB), University of Kent (GB), Kent and Medway Medical School
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.