Europe, secteurs économiques et développement rural

One of the key bets laid by the 1988 reform of the structural funds was to incite actors from diffferent branches of the economy to work more closely together through the territo- rialisation of sectoral logics. However, given the strength of the policy networks involved, the actual integration of EU- funded projects has been relatively low. This article seeks to explain this state of affairs by sketching out translations of the funds for agriculture and for tourism in France, Spain and the United Kingdom. The central hypothesis developed is that in spite of the commitment of Commission officials and many actors in the field, translation of the EU's rural development policy cannot overide the contours of the local- sectoral relations which exist in each area. If the universalism of the integrated approach turns out to be a ghost, nevertheless it has fueled the institutionalisation of new modes of public action within a political system which may now be European but which remains highly polycentric.

Publication Details

Journal
AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.354335
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Europe, secteurs économiques et développement rural

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Rural development and sustainability
article

Europe, secteurs économiques et développement rural

article en

Abstract

One of the key bets laid by the 1988 reform of the structural funds was to incite actors from diffferent branches of the economy to work more closely together through the territo- rialisation of sectoral logics. However, given the strength of the policy networks involved, the actual integration of EU- funded projects has been relatively low. This article seeks to explain this state of affairs by sketching out translations of the funds for agriculture and for tourism in France, Spain and the United Kingdom. The central hypothesis developed is that in spite of the commitment of Commission officials and many actors in the field, translation of the EU's rural development policy cannot overide the contours of the local- sectoral relations which exist in each area. If the universalism of the integrated approach turns out to be a ghost, nevertheless it has fueled the institutionalisation of new modes of public action within a political system which may now be European but which remains highly polycentric.

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.