A Comparative Analysis of WinSRFR and SIRMOD Software for Simulating Surge and Alternate Furrow Irrigation Performance in Maize Fields

In order to compare of WinSRFR and SIRMOD software in simulating furrow irrigation performance, a field experiment was carried out in the Jayedar Plain. Five different furrow irrigation methods including conventional furrow irrigation (CFI), surge irrigation with on/off cycle ratios of 1 and 0.5 (SFI1-1 and SFI1-2, respectively), fixed alternate irrigation (FFI) and variable alternate irrigation (AFI) were investigated. A total of 15 irrigation evaluations were performed at the initial, middle, and end of the growing season by measuring inflow rate, cutoff time, outflow rate, infiltration and advance time. The length and spacing of experimental furrows were 120 and 0.75 m and the inflow and cutoff times at the initial (3rd irrigation), middle (6th irrigation), and end (9th irrigation) were 0.28 L/s and 240 min, 0.42 L/s and 360 min, 0.35 L/s and 300 min, respectively. The WinSRFR 3.1 and SIRMOD software were calibrated, assessed, and compared using field measurements based on the zero-inertia model. WinSRFR and SIRMOD softwares demonstrated a strong correlation between the measured and simulated values of runoff, infiltration and advance time (coefficient of determination of (0.9984, 0.9976), (0.9908, 0.9932 ) and (0.9449, 0.9331), respectively. The relative error values of WinSRFR and SIRMOD Software in estimating runoff, infiltration and advance time were (2.96, 3.15), (3.03, 3.30), (2.09, 2.46) respectively. Both software overestimates the runoff (λ=1.0296 in WinSRFR and λ= 1.0315 in SIRMOD) and the advance time (λ=1.0209 in WinSRFR and λ= 1.0246 in SIRMOD). The WinSRFR software underestimates infiltration (λ=0.9697) but SIRMOD software overestimates infiltration (λ=1.0333). The results of this study show that AFI is a more suitable method for maize irrigation in the study area. The WinSRFR software has an advantage over the SIRMOD software in simulating furrow irrigation performance due to its higher ability and the use of a wide range of input parameters.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22055/jise.2024.45967.2116
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of WinSRFR and SIRMOD Software for Simulating Surge and Alternate Furrow Irrigation Performance in Maize Fields

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
article

A Comparative Analysis of WinSRFR and SIRMOD Software for Simulating Surge and Alternate Furrow Irrigation Performance in Maize Fields

article en

Abstract

In order to compare of WinSRFR and SIRMOD software in simulating furrow irrigation performance, a field experiment was carried out in the Jayedar Plain. Five different furrow irrigation methods including conventional furrow irrigation (CFI), surge irrigation with on/off cycle ratios of 1 and 0.5 (SFI1-1 and SFI1-2, respectively), fixed alternate irrigation (FFI) and variable alternate irrigation (AFI) were investigated. A total of 15 irrigation evaluations were performed at the initial, middle, and end of the growing season by measuring inflow rate, cutoff time, outflow rate, infiltration and advance time. The length and spacing of experimental furrows were 120 and 0.75 m and the inflow and cutoff times at the initial (3rd irrigation), middle (6th irrigation), and end (9th irrigation) were 0.28 L/s and 240 min, 0.42 L/s and 360 min, 0.35 L/s and 300 min, respectively. The WinSRFR 3.1 and SIRMOD software were calibrated, assessed, and compared using field measurements based on the zero-inertia model. WinSRFR and SIRMOD softwares demonstrated a strong correlation between the measured and simulated values of runoff, infiltration and advance time (coefficient of determination of (0.9984, 0.9976), (0.9908, 0.9932 ) and (0.9449, 0.9331), respectively. The relative error values of WinSRFR and SIRMOD Software in estimating runoff, infiltration and advance time were (2.96, 3.15), (3.03, 3.30), (2.09, 2.46) respectively. Both software overestimates the runoff (λ=1.0296 in WinSRFR and λ= 1.0315 in SIRMOD) and the advance time (λ=1.0209 in WinSRFR and λ= 1.0246 in SIRMOD). The WinSRFR software underestimates infiltration (λ=0.9697) but SIRMOD software overestimates infiltration (λ=1.0333). The results of this study show that AFI is a more suitable method for maize irrigation in the study area. The WinSRFR software has an advantage over the SIRMOD software in simulating furrow irrigation performance due to its higher ability and the use of a wide range of input parameters.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz (IR), University of Tehran (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of WinSRFR and SIRMOD Software for Simulating Surge and Alternate Furrow Irrigation Performance in Maize Fields · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS