La estrambótica elección judicial mexicana

The reform of the Judicial Branch in Mexico is not an isolated process nor the result of a hasty decision, but rather it is part of a strategy of change that seeks to dismantle the rule of law and undermine democracy. Presented as a necessary replacement of the entire judicial apparatus, given the formal power held by judges and magistrates, an exercise that seemed impossible was proposed, but which little by little was given space for its realization, with abuses and omissions of some and other powers and organizations with the intention of, beyond formalities, giving way to one of the most complex challenges that have been faced in the institutional life of the country. However, its concretion forces us to establish the limits to the exercise of power no longer from the legal, but from the political.

Publication Details

Journal
129
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22201/iij/24484881e.2025.53.19838
Primary Topic
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

La estrambótica elección judicial mexicana

129
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
article

La estrambótica elección judicial mexicana

article en

Abstract

The reform of the Judicial Branch in Mexico is not an isolated process nor the result of a hasty decision, but rather it is part of a strategy of change that seeks to dismantle the rule of law and undermine democracy. Presented as a necessary replacement of the entire judicial apparatus, given the formal power held by judges and magistrates, an exercise that seemed impossible was proposed, but which little by little was given space for its realization, with abuses and omissions of some and other powers and organizations with the intention of, beyond formalities, giving way to one of the most complex challenges that have been faced in the institutional life of the country. However, its concretion forces us to establish the limits to the exercise of power no longer from the legal, but from the political.

129
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

La estrambótica elección judicial mexicana · 129 (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS