Analyse critique des lois d'orientation

A critical analysis of the 1960 and 1962 Agriculture Acts - The 1960 and 1962 Agriculture Acts did at least define a global agricultural policy, but were not thorough-going enough. The Government at the time, by choosing the family-type farm, intended to promote a policy of employment in agriculture, but the means of implementing this policy (SAFER, the refusal to allow one farmer to acquire more than a stipulated acrage, IVD) were inadequate. The principle of selectivity on which the acts were based was a foretaste of the new orientations of the European social structure policy (development plans) and regional selectivity, that at first seemed incoherent, heralded the various forms of aid to rural modernisation and to mountain areas. At the time the real extent of the problems posed by non-agricultural country planning had not been realized. Similarly the too analytical conception of agricultural policy and its implementation was an obstacle to its efficiency, in spite of later attempts to make this policy more global. Finally the Agriculture Acts have proved to be inadequate as far as land policy in concerned since the problem of financing land purchase has been evaded.

Publication Details

Journal
AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.350897
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyse critique des lois d'orientation

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
article

Analyse critique des lois d'orientation

article en

Abstract

A critical analysis of the 1960 and 1962 Agriculture Acts - The 1960 and 1962 Agriculture Acts did at least define a global agricultural policy, but were not thorough-going enough. The Government at the time, by choosing the family-type farm, intended to promote a policy of employment in agriculture, but the means of implementing this policy (SAFER, the refusal to allow one farmer to acquire more than a stipulated acrage, IVD) were inadequate. The principle of selectivity on which the acts were based was a foretaste of the new orientations of the European social structure policy (development plans) and regional selectivity, that at first seemed incoherent, heralded the various forms of aid to rural modernisation and to mountain areas. At the time the real extent of the problems posed by non-agricultural country planning had not been realized. Similarly the too analytical conception of agricultural policy and its implementation was an obstacle to its efficiency, in spite of later attempts to make this policy more global. Finally the Agriculture Acts have proved to be inadequate as far as land policy in concerned since the problem of financing land purchase has been evaded.

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analyse critique des lois d'orientation · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS