Régulation des médias sociaux en France. Le cadre juridique à l’épreuve des usages médiatiques

If social media have changed modes of communication and freed up speech, it's important to question how speech is regulated on platforms to prevent deviance linked to social media uses. In an approach focused on moderation practices (Gillepsie, 2018), verbal violence and rising conflictual tension (Moïse et al. 2008a; Fracchiolla & al. 2013), the study attempts to present, on the one hand, the moderation measures that frame publications on social media in France, and, on the other, it shows how deviance; in this case hate speech, circumvents the regulatory measures proposed by platforms as well as the texts and laws adopted by the State. Content analysis of the corpus reveals that, despite automated regulatory measures based on technology and legislative texts, certain forms of deviance, such as irony, veiled insults and racial stereotypes, continue to circulate in discursive spaces through a variety of strategies.

Publication Details

Journal
ESSACHESS/Essachess
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21409/srrw-6171
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Régulation des médias sociaux en France. Le cadre juridique à l’épreuve des usages médiatiques

ESSACHESS/Essachess
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Régulation des médias sociaux en France. Le cadre juridique à l’épreuve des usages médiatiques

article en

Abstract

If social media have changed modes of communication and freed up speech, it's important to question how speech is regulated on platforms to prevent deviance linked to social media uses. In an approach focused on moderation practices (Gillepsie, 2018), verbal violence and rising conflictual tension (Moïse et al. 2008a; Fracchiolla & al. 2013), the study attempts to present, on the one hand, the moderation measures that frame publications on social media in France, and, on the other, it shows how deviance; in this case hate speech, circumvents the regulatory measures proposed by platforms as well as the texts and laws adopted by the State. Content analysis of the corpus reveals that, despite automated regulatory measures based on technology and legislative texts, certain forms of deviance, such as irony, veiled insults and racial stereotypes, continue to circulate in discursive spaces through a variety of strategies.

ESSACHESS/Essachess
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.