Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients

Soil evaporation and crop transpiration are fundamental processes in modelling water transport, which is crucial for irrigation planning and scheduling. This study compares two methods to determine these components of crop evapotranspiration: (i) the straightforward single crop coefficient method, and (ii) the dual crop coefficient method, which may be more suitable for daily irrigation scheduling. Experimental data were collected from a spinach crop grown in pots between June and September 2022, using drip irrigation with three different soils (two sandy loams and one loam), inside a polytunnel, during two growth cycles. Meteorological data, plant height, and root depth were measured onsite. The particle size distribution was used to obtain soil hydraulic properties for dual crop coefficient method. Soil cover fraction was obtained with the Canopeo software. The results showed that crop evapotranspiration and its partitioning in evaporation and transpiration differ between the two methods. The single crop coefficient method resulted in overall lower crop evapotranspiration throughout the growth cycles, while attributing a relatively larger proportion of evapotranspiration to evaporation, particularly after the midpoint of the growth cycles.

Publication Details

Journal
Revistas SARC
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.38548
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients

Revistas SARC
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients

article en

Abstract

Soil evaporation and crop transpiration are fundamental processes in modelling water transport, which is crucial for irrigation planning and scheduling. This study compares two methods to determine these components of crop evapotranspiration: (i) the straightforward single crop coefficient method, and (ii) the dual crop coefficient method, which may be more suitable for daily irrigation scheduling. Experimental data were collected from a spinach crop grown in pots between June and September 2022, using drip irrigation with three different soils (two sandy loams and one loam), inside a polytunnel, during two growth cycles. Meteorological data, plant height, and root depth were measured onsite. The particle size distribution was used to obtain soil hydraulic properties for dual crop coefficient method. Soil cover fraction was obtained with the Canopeo software. The results showed that crop evapotranspiration and its partitioning in evaporation and transpiration differ between the two methods. The single crop coefficient method resulted in overall lower crop evapotranspiration throughout the growth cycles, while attributing a relatively larger proportion of evapotranspiration to evaporation, particularly after the midpoint of the growth cycles.

Revistas SARC
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients · Revistas SARC (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS