Analyzing artificial intelligence in education with critical-constructive perspectives: The Vechta Venn

Against the background of differing disciplinary understandings of AI in education, we suggest a theoretical framework – the Vechta Venn – as an analytical lens. The Venn informs theoretical discussion on AI in education and is applicable for empirical research. Drawing on contemporary research from educational sciences, media studies, and cultural studies and moreover identifying disciplinary overlaps, we introduce a rather theoretical-analytical approach than an empirically study on AI. In doing so, we follow a theoretical three-step of argumentation. First, we introduce the main lines of thought for each of the three disciplinary perspectives in their differences and specialties. Second, we focus on the intersections and overlapping of each pair of perspectives, respectively. Third, having outlined the respective synergies, we get to the core of the Venn, combining all three perspectives, interrogating the Venn’s applicability.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21243/mi-01-25-31
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing artificial intelligence in education with critical-constructive perspectives: The Vechta Venn

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
article

Analyzing artificial intelligence in education with critical-constructive perspectives: The Vechta Venn

article en

Abstract

Against the background of differing disciplinary understandings of AI in education, we suggest a theoretical framework – the Vechta Venn – as an analytical lens. The Venn informs theoretical discussion on AI in education and is applicable for empirical research. Drawing on contemporary research from educational sciences, media studies, and cultural studies and moreover identifying disciplinary overlaps, we introduce a rather theoretical-analytical approach than an empirically study on AI. In doing so, we follow a theoretical three-step of argumentation. First, we introduce the main lines of thought for each of the three disciplinary perspectives in their differences and specialties. Second, we focus on the intersections and overlapping of each pair of perspectives, respectively. Third, having outlined the respective synergies, we get to the core of the Venn, combining all three perspectives, interrogating the Venn’s applicability.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Vechta (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.