eIDAS 2.0: Evaluating the Issuance of Digital University Diplomas

This study examines the implementation challenges and strategic approaches for issuing eIDAS-compliant digital university diplomas. Through a mixed-methods approach that combines regulatory analysis with twelve expert interviews involving Qualified Trust Service Provider (QTSP) executives, conformity assessment specialists, and higher education stakeholders, we evaluate two primary issuance methods: qualified electronic sealed documents with qualified electronic timestamps or Qualified Electronic Attestations of Attributes (QEAA). Our findings reveal that while QEAA offers superior interoperability and holder binding, it faces regulatory uncertainty and implementation complexities. The research indicates that becoming a QTSP presents significant challenges for individual institutions, primarily due to security requirements, high operational costs, and complex conformity assessment processes. We identify three viable alternatives: outsourcing to existing QTSPs, forming university alliances to distribute costs, or implementing a ’bring-your-own-QTSP’ model. This paper provides practical guidance for higher education institutions, emphasizing the importance of standardization, cross-institutional collaboration, and sustainable implementation strategies to enhance the value and portability of digital academic credentials across Europe. Diplomas

Publication Details

Journal
Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18420/oid2025_15
Primary Topic
Open Education and E-Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

eIDAS 2.0: Evaluating the Issuance of Digital University Diplomas

Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Open Education and E-Learning
article

eIDAS 2.0: Evaluating the Issuance of Digital University Diplomas

article en

Abstract

This study examines the implementation challenges and strategic approaches for issuing eIDAS-compliant digital university diplomas. Through a mixed-methods approach that combines regulatory analysis with twelve expert interviews involving Qualified Trust Service Provider (QTSP) executives, conformity assessment specialists, and higher education stakeholders, we evaluate two primary issuance methods: qualified electronic sealed documents with qualified electronic timestamps or Qualified Electronic Attestations of Attributes (QEAA). Our findings reveal that while QEAA offers superior interoperability and holder binding, it faces regulatory uncertainty and implementation complexities. The research indicates that becoming a QTSP presents significant challenges for individual institutions, primarily due to security requirements, high operational costs, and complex conformity assessment processes. We identify three viable alternatives: outsourcing to existing QTSPs, forming university alliances to distribute costs, or implementing a ’bring-your-own-QTSP’ model. This paper provides practical guidance for higher education institutions, emphasizing the importance of standardization, cross-institutional collaboration, and sustainable implementation strategies to enhance the value and portability of digital academic credentials across Europe. Diplomas

Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Open Education and E-Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

eIDAS 2.0: Evaluating the Issuance of Digital University Diplomas · Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS