How is the power dynamics or social structure in society influencing the scalability of Electronic-Skin as a global technology

This paper discusses how power dynamics and social structures significantly limit the scalability of electronic skin (e-skin) as a global technology. E-skin has the potential to change the game in healthcare, law enforcement, and robotics—but that potential means very little when access is controlled by a small group of elites more focused on profit than the public good. Through the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) lens, this paper connects the dots between race, gender, class, and disability to show how technology often reflects existing social biases. Marginalized groups, especially pregnant women of color, are too often left out of the conversation, despite being the ones who could benefit the most. The paper argues that without holding the right people accountable and designing with equity in mind, e-skin won’t live up to what it could be.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Libra
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18130/31bn-n706
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How is the power dynamics or social structure in society influencing the scalability of Electronic-Skin as a global technology

Libra
Disability Rights and Representation
article

How is the power dynamics or social structure in society influencing the scalability of Electronic-Skin as a global technology

article en

Abstract

This paper discusses how power dynamics and social structures significantly limit the scalability of electronic skin (e-skin) as a global technology. E-skin has the potential to change the game in healthcare, law enforcement, and robotics—but that potential means very little when access is controlled by a small group of elites more focused on profit than the public good. Through the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) lens, this paper connects the dots between race, gender, class, and disability to show how technology often reflects existing social biases. Marginalized groups, especially pregnant women of color, are too often left out of the conversation, despite being the ones who could benefit the most. The paper argues that without holding the right people accountable and designing with equity in mind, e-skin won’t live up to what it could be.

Libra
University of Virginia (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.