Polar particles in Farsi: Anaphora in the scoreboard model of discourse

Cross-linguistically, polar particles can be used in two readings: 'polarity' and 'conformity'. In response to positive polar questions/assertions, the two readings of each particle generate the same proposition. However, in response to negative initiatives, they lead to ambiguity (Krifka, 2013; Roelofsen and Farkas, 2015; Geist and Repp, in press). In this paper, we investigate the reading(s) of the particles 'âre' ‘yes’ and 'na' ‘no’ in Farsi for five types of initiatives: (i) positive assertions, (ii) negative assertions, (iii) negative polar questions (NPQs), (iv) biased negative questions with the discourse particle 'dige' ('dige'-NPQs) and (v) tag questions (TQs). Based on the distribution of readings, we argue that different readings of polar particles react to propositions placed in different compartments of the Scoreboard Model representation.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2024.v28.1149
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polar particles in Farsi: Anaphora in the scoreboard model of discourse

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Polar particles in Farsi: Anaphora in the scoreboard model of discourse

article en

Abstract

Cross-linguistically, polar particles can be used in two readings: 'polarity' and 'conformity'. In response to positive polar questions/assertions, the two readings of each particle generate the same proposition. However, in response to negative initiatives, they lead to ambiguity (Krifka, 2013; Roelofsen and Farkas, 2015; Geist and Repp, in press). In this paper, we investigate the reading(s) of the particles 'âre' ‘yes’ and 'na' ‘no’ in Farsi for five types of initiatives: (i) positive assertions, (ii) negative assertions, (iii) negative polar questions (NPQs), (iv) biased negative questions with the discourse particle 'dige' ('dige'-NPQs) and (v) tag questions (TQs). Based on the distribution of readings, we argue that different readings of polar particles react to propositions placed in different compartments of the Scoreboard Model representation.

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.