Evaluation of tensile properties of 3D-printed aortic models

Cardiovascular diseases are the primary cause of mortality globally, underscoring the necessity for realistic vascular models to aid in the development of endovascular devices and training for interventionalists. While 3D printing holds promise for generating anatomically accurate blood vessel models, there is limited information on how well 3D-printed materials can replicate the elastic characteristics of the aortic wall. Consequently, this work aims to characterize the stiffness of 3D-printed composite materials in relation to biological vascular tissue. The mechanical properties of homogeneous and composite 3D-printed multilayer samples, both with and without additional embedded helical structures were tested and compared to porcine aortic samples and values for human aortic tissue gleaned from literature. The 3D printing materials had a hardness of either Shore 30A or 70A, using Stratasys Agilus or a combination of Agilus and VeroClear. All samples were printed with a Stratasys J850 PolyJet 3D printer (Stratasys Ltd., Eden Prairie, Minnesota, U.S.A). Uniaxial tension tests were conducted on ring-shaped samples using a Galdabini Quasar 100 universal testing machine (Galdabini SPA, Cardano al Campo, Italy) equipped with a 50 N load cell. Samples were deformed at a rate of 500 mm/min until they reached 10% deformation of the initial diameter, simulating the strain experienced by aortic tissue in the body. The deformation results yielded stiffness values ranging from 1.16 N/mm to 4.83 N/mm for 3D-printed materials, while both porcine samples and healthy human aorta stiffness values from literature ranged from 0.22 N/mm to 0.45 N/mm. The homogeneous 30A material, as well as multilayered 30A and 70A materials lacking helical structures, neared the stiffness ranges of biological tissue. Although 3D-printed composite materials are generally stiffer than biological tissue, the 3D-printed materials in this work could be used to emulate diseased tissue, such as vasculature afflicted by atherosclerosis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infinite Science GmbH
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18416/ammm.2025.25062111
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of tensile properties of 3D-printed aortic models

Infinite Science GmbH
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Evaluation of tensile properties of 3D-printed aortic models

article en

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are the primary cause of mortality globally, underscoring the necessity for realistic vascular models to aid in the development of endovascular devices and training for interventionalists. While 3D printing holds promise for generating anatomically accurate blood vessel models, there is limited information on how well 3D-printed materials can replicate the elastic characteristics of the aortic wall. Consequently, this work aims to characterize the stiffness of 3D-printed composite materials in relation to biological vascular tissue. The mechanical properties of homogeneous and composite 3D-printed multilayer samples, both with and without additional embedded helical structures were tested and compared to porcine aortic samples and values for human aortic tissue gleaned from literature. The 3D printing materials had a hardness of either Shore 30A or 70A, using Stratasys Agilus or a combination of Agilus and VeroClear. All samples were printed with a Stratasys J850 PolyJet 3D printer (Stratasys Ltd., Eden Prairie, Minnesota, U.S.A). Uniaxial tension tests were conducted on ring-shaped samples using a Galdabini Quasar 100 universal testing machine (Galdabini SPA, Cardano al Campo, Italy) equipped with a 50 N load cell. Samples were deformed at a rate of 500 mm/min until they reached 10% deformation of the initial diameter, simulating the strain experienced by aortic tissue in the body. The deformation results yielded stiffness values ranging from 1.16 N/mm to 4.83 N/mm for 3D-printed materials, while both porcine samples and healthy human aorta stiffness values from literature ranged from 0.22 N/mm to 0.45 N/mm. The homogeneous 30A material, as well as multilayered 30A and 70A materials lacking helical structures, neared the stiffness ranges of biological tissue. Although 3D-printed composite materials are generally stiffer than biological tissue, the 3D-printed materials in this work could be used to emulate diseased tissue, such as vasculature afflicted by atherosclerosis.

Infinite Science GmbH
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für Individualisierte Medizintechnik (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.