Mapping and (re)lating: Indigenous geographies and archaeology

Academic departures from dualistic Western thinking—such as the so-called ‘ontological turn’—in recent decades have spurred a number of archaeological approaches to relational ontologies, though the centrality of Indigenous theory to these approaches remains underrecognised. This paper contributes to the conceptualisation of an Indigenous relational archaeology by placing archaeology in conversation with Indigenous geographies. This framing situates archaeological research, like Indigenous geographies, as a form of mapping centering place-based knowledge and relations, often involving a (re)mapping of knowledge and relations disrupted through processes of colonialism and abstractive Western research. I explore this conceptualisation of archaeological research particularly as it applies to legacy collections—those assemblages removed and placed within museums or other secondary spaces. By conceptualising archaeology as mapping, we can begin to frame both the theoretical approach to material culture and our methodological approaches to archaeological study through the lens of Indigenous relationality.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.120376
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping and (re)lating: Indigenous geographies and archaeology

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Mapping and (re)lating: Indigenous geographies and archaeology

article en

Abstract

Academic departures from dualistic Western thinking—such as the so-called ‘ontological turn’—in recent decades have spurred a number of archaeological approaches to relational ontologies, though the centrality of Indigenous theory to these approaches remains underrecognised. This paper contributes to the conceptualisation of an Indigenous relational archaeology by placing archaeology in conversation with Indigenous geographies. This framing situates archaeological research, like Indigenous geographies, as a form of mapping centering place-based knowledge and relations, often involving a (re)mapping of knowledge and relations disrupted through processes of colonialism and abstractive Western research. I explore this conceptualisation of archaeological research particularly as it applies to legacy collections—those assemblages removed and placed within museums or other secondary spaces. By conceptualising archaeology as mapping, we can begin to frame both the theoretical approach to material culture and our methodological approaches to archaeological study through the lens of Indigenous relationality.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
American Council of Learned Societies, Society for the Humanities, Cornell University
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.