Early and Middle Phase Clinical Trial Designs for Groups

This dissertation presents phase I and phase II trial designs for groups. In particular, groups completely or partially ordered by dose sensitivity are considered. Groups are completely or partially ordered when the groups can be completely or partially ordered by the probability of an adverse event for any given dose, respectively. A pair of phase I clinical trials are presented in this dissertation: the Quasi-CRM Shift method and the Group Averaged Bayesian Optimal Interval Design (GAB). The Quasi-CRM Shift method is the first design for partially ordered groups considering ordinal toxicity, allowing clinicians to control for the frequency and severity of adverse events during dose selection. GAB is the first model-assisted design for partially ordered groups, a class of designs marked by their simplicity. Simulation studies show that GAB performs as well as more complex model-based designs, demonstrating GAB provides clinicians with a simple design that performs well. Large sample properties show allocation under GAB tends to correct doses. Both the Quasi-CRM Shift and GAB demonstrate that utilizing the group ordering leads to increased accuracy in dose allocation during the trial and dose selection at the end of the trial. In addition to the phase I designs, a pair of phase II designs are presented in this dissertation. These designs consider a trial with multiple doses and two ordered groups. At the end of the trial, doses are determined to be acceptable or unacceptable. The first design is a single-stage design and maximizes power subject to a type I error constraint. The second design is a two-stage design with cutoffs determining if a dose continues onto the second stage for a group. This design minimizes the number of unacceptable doses that continue onto the second stage while meeting power and type I error requirements. Through the development of these designs, clinicians are provided with multi-dose designs in the group framework, extending dose exploration and optimization into phase II.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Libra
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18130/cbxy-wh50
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early and Middle Phase Clinical Trial Designs for Groups

Libra
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Early and Middle Phase Clinical Trial Designs for Groups

article en

Abstract

This dissertation presents phase I and phase II trial designs for groups. In particular, groups completely or partially ordered by dose sensitivity are considered. Groups are completely or partially ordered when the groups can be completely or partially ordered by the probability of an adverse event for any given dose, respectively. A pair of phase I clinical trials are presented in this dissertation: the Quasi-CRM Shift method and the Group Averaged Bayesian Optimal Interval Design (GAB). The Quasi-CRM Shift method is the first design for partially ordered groups considering ordinal toxicity, allowing clinicians to control for the frequency and severity of adverse events during dose selection. GAB is the first model-assisted design for partially ordered groups, a class of designs marked by their simplicity. Simulation studies show that GAB performs as well as more complex model-based designs, demonstrating GAB provides clinicians with a simple design that performs well. Large sample properties show allocation under GAB tends to correct doses. Both the Quasi-CRM Shift and GAB demonstrate that utilizing the group ordering leads to increased accuracy in dose allocation during the trial and dose selection at the end of the trial. In addition to the phase I designs, a pair of phase II designs are presented in this dissertation. These designs consider a trial with multiple doses and two ordered groups. At the end of the trial, doses are determined to be acceptable or unacceptable. The first design is a single-stage design and maximizes power subject to a type I error constraint. The second design is a two-stage design with cutoffs determining if a dose continues onto the second stage for a group. This design minimizes the number of unacceptable doses that continue onto the second stage while meeting power and type I error requirements. Through the development of these designs, clinicians are provided with multi-dose designs in the group framework, extending dose exploration and optimization into phase II.

Libra
University of Virginia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.