Assessing the Factor Structure of Mindfulness, Mood, and Cognition Items in an Ecological Momentary Assessment Battery

In this study, I sought to elucidate the underlying multilevel factor structure of an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) battery of mindfulness, mood, and cognition items. In line with previous findings from literature, I predicted the multilevel factor structure that would best fit the data would have three factors at both the between- and within-person level: mindfulness, mood, and cognition. Additionally, I proposed alternate possible factor structures. I also hypothesized that the final factor structure would have good psychometric properties, including reliability, convergent validity, and measurement invariance. I conducted multilevel factor analyses on EMA data from n = 585 older adults (mean age of 71.5 years). After I tested the hypothesized factor structures via multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (MLCFA), I used multilevel exploratory factor analysis (MLEFA) and then tested novel, un-hypothesized factor structures based on the MLEFA results. I determined two underlying factor structures with good model fit, both of which had three factors at each level (negative mood, cognition/mindfulness, positive mood/mindfulness). The psychometric properties of these factors were strong. Lastly, I examined prospective relationships amongst the factors and found significant autoregressive and cross-construct effects. The results of the current study support the utility of a novel EMA battery to index momentary mood and cognition, but not mindfulness.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/25c6-sm49
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Factor Structure of Mindfulness, Mood, and Cognition Items in an Ecological Momentary Assessment Battery

UNC Libraries
Islamic Finance and Communication
article

Assessing the Factor Structure of Mindfulness, Mood, and Cognition Items in an Ecological Momentary Assessment Battery

article en

Abstract

In this study, I sought to elucidate the underlying multilevel factor structure of an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) battery of mindfulness, mood, and cognition items. In line with previous findings from literature, I predicted the multilevel factor structure that would best fit the data would have three factors at both the between- and within-person level: mindfulness, mood, and cognition. Additionally, I proposed alternate possible factor structures. I also hypothesized that the final factor structure would have good psychometric properties, including reliability, convergent validity, and measurement invariance. I conducted multilevel factor analyses on EMA data from n = 585 older adults (mean age of 71.5 years). After I tested the hypothesized factor structures via multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (MLCFA), I used multilevel exploratory factor analysis (MLEFA) and then tested novel, un-hypothesized factor structures based on the MLEFA results. I determined two underlying factor structures with good model fit, both of which had three factors at each level (negative mood, cognition/mindfulness, positive mood/mindfulness). The psychometric properties of these factors were strong. Lastly, I examined prospective relationships amongst the factors and found significant autoregressive and cross-construct effects. The results of the current study support the utility of a novel EMA battery to index momentary mood and cognition, but not mindfulness.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Islamic Finance and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.