A Meta-Analysis of Testing Effects with Free Recall

Retrieval practice improves memory more than restudying— the testing effect (TE). While most studies have concentrated on the direct TE (improved memory for tested material), the designs used often fail to account for the influence of forward TEs (improved memory for material learned after a test). In many studies of “the testing effect,” both effects are at play. Mulligan et al. (2022) reported an absence of a direct TE when using free recall as retrieval practice and rather found evidence of forward TEs. Such findings warrant a new meta-analysis on TEs with free recall, that examines direct and forward TEs and the factors that moderate them. This meta-analysis does so by distinguishing between studies capable of isolating the direct TE and those that are susceptible to both direct and forward TEs. Significant differences between these categories of studies underscore the importance of differentiating between direct and forward TEs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/dy6t-j325
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Meta-Analysis of Testing Effects with Free Recall

UNC Libraries
Memory Processes and Influences
article

A Meta-Analysis of Testing Effects with Free Recall

article en

Abstract

Retrieval practice improves memory more than restudying— the testing effect (TE). While most studies have concentrated on the direct TE (improved memory for tested material), the designs used often fail to account for the influence of forward TEs (improved memory for material learned after a test). In many studies of “the testing effect,” both effects are at play. Mulligan et al. (2022) reported an absence of a direct TE when using free recall as retrieval practice and rather found evidence of forward TEs. Such findings warrant a new meta-analysis on TEs with free recall, that examines direct and forward TEs and the factors that moderate them. This meta-analysis does so by distinguishing between studies capable of isolating the direct TE and those that are susceptible to both direct and forward TEs. Significant differences between these categories of studies underscore the importance of differentiating between direct and forward TEs.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.