Representation and Rhetoric of Disability and Disabled People: A Content Analysis of Digital Archives on Disability

This study analyzed the representation and rhetoric of disability and disabled people within three digital archives on disability: the Disability History Museum; the University of California, Berkeley’s Disability Rights and Independent Living Movement Project; and the National Federation of the Blind's Jacobus tenBroek Library. Using qualitative content analysis, I examined how disability is represented in those archives, how Brilmyer’s (2020) critical disability archival methodology shows up in those archives, and how that methodology might be further applied to archives. The data collected came from a close reading of the websites and digital repositories of the three case studies. The study aimed to further the scholarly and practical intersections of disability and archives by influencing future research regarding critical disability archival methodology.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/qwmz-n176
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representation and Rhetoric of Disability and Disabled People: A Content Analysis of Digital Archives on Disability

UNC Libraries
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Representation and Rhetoric of Disability and Disabled People: A Content Analysis of Digital Archives on Disability

article en

Abstract

This study analyzed the representation and rhetoric of disability and disabled people within three digital archives on disability: the Disability History Museum; the University of California, Berkeley’s Disability Rights and Independent Living Movement Project; and the National Federation of the Blind's Jacobus tenBroek Library. Using qualitative content analysis, I examined how disability is represented in those archives, how Brilmyer’s (2020) critical disability archival methodology shows up in those archives, and how that methodology might be further applied to archives. The data collected came from a close reading of the websites and digital repositories of the three case studies. The study aimed to further the scholarly and practical intersections of disability and archives by influencing future research regarding critical disability archival methodology.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.